Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT03843463

Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia

In this project, the investigators will investigate the effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), escitalopram, on augmenting language therapy effectiveness, as measured by naming untrained pictures and describing pictures, in individuals with aphasia in the acute and subacute post stroke period (i.e., within three months post stroke).

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

18 year–99 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

In this project, the investigators will investigate the effects of a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), escitalopram, on augmenting language therapy effectiveness, as measured by naming untrained pictures and describing pictures, in individuals with aphasia in the acute and subacute post stroke period (i.e., within three months post stroke). There has been no previous randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the effect of daily SSRI in the first three months after stroke on improvement of language in people undergoing aphasia treatment. It is plausible that SSRIs, which elevate synaptic serotonin, might enhance recovery by augmenting synaptic plasticity.

The investigators propose to conduct a Phase 2 multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram for augmenting language intervention in subacute stroke. The investigators hypothesize that daily escitalopram for 90 days after stroke results in greater improvement (compared to placebo) in naming untrained pictures, as well as greater increase in content of picture description and greater improvement in morphosyntactic production, when combined with speech and language treatment (SALT). A second aim is to evaluate the mechanisms of language recovery in individuals who receive active medical treatment and those who receive placebo, using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and genetic testing. The investigators hypothesize that greater improvement in language is associated with increased connectivity within the left hemisphere language network on rsfMRI in participants who receive escitalopram than in those who receive placebo, independently of improvement in depression. The investigators also hypothesize that the effects are greatest in individuals with val/val allele of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) - (consistent with previous studies showing a greater response to treatment and greater neuroplasticity in people with the val/val allele than those with one or more met alleles.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants must have sustained an acute ischemic left hemisphere stroke.
  • Participants must be fluent speakers of English by self-report.
  • Participants must be capable of giving informed consent or indicating a legally authorized representative to provide informed consent.
  • Participants must be age 18 or older.
  • Participants must be within 5 days of onset of stroke.
  • Participants must be pre-morbidly right-handed by self-report.
  • Participants must have an aphasia diagnosis as confirmed by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (Aphasia Quotient < 93.8).

Exclusion criteria

  • Previous neurological disease affecting the brain including previous symptomatic stroke
  • Diagnosis of schizophrenia, autism, or other psychiatric or neurological condition that affects naming/language
  • A history of additional risk factors for torsades de pointes (TdP; e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long QT Syndrome)
  • Current severe depression, defined as a score of > 15 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
  • Uncorrected visual loss or hearing loss by self-report
  • Use of any medication approved by the FDA for treatment of depression at the time of stroke onset
  • Concomitant use of any monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or pimozide, or other drugs that prolong the QT/QTc interval, triptans (and other 5-Hydroxytryptamine Receptor Agonists), or other contraindications to escitalopram that may be identified.
  • A QTc greater than 450 milliseconds on electrocardiogram or evidence of hyponatremia (Na < 130) at baseline
  • Pregnancy at the time of stroke or planning to become pregnant during the study term.

Treatment and study plan

Escitalopram 10mg

Drug

Escitalopram tablet

Other names: Lexapro

Placebo

Drug

Sugar pill manufactured to mimic escitalopram 10 mg tablet

Other names: Placebo (for Escitalopram)

Computer-delivered naming treatment

Behavioral

15 45-minute sessions of computer-delivered naming treatment beginning two months following stroke

Other names: Computer-delivered naming treatment (CoDeNT)

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Philadelphia Naming Test short-form accuracy score

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Number of correctly named items of 30 total items on the computerized picture naming assessment. Scores ranges from 0 to 30 with higher scores meaning better naming ability.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Language production as assessed by lexical features of discourse in "Cookie Theft" picture description

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Lexical features, meaning carrying units of language (morphemes), will be counted for each Cookie Theft picture description. There is no maximum number of meaning carrying units, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.

  2. Language production as assessed by content units included in picture description of "Cookie Theft"

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. A ratio of included left content units to included right content units then can be calculated and interpreted as a measure of hemispatial attention.

  3. Language production as assessed by rate of syllables per content unit produced in "Cookie Theft" picture description

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Syllables included in the picture description are counted. Content units are based on a standard scoring template of commonly identified concepts (nouns and verbs) in the left and right regions of the "Cookie Theft" picture. Participants either include or fail to include 30 concepts on the left side of the picture and 23 concepts on the right side of the picture. The average rate of syllables per content unit produced can then be calculated and interpreted as a measure of efficiency in producing relevant information in the task.

  4. Depression as assessed by Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    9 item scale scored 0-3 for each item. PHQ-9 scores of 5, 10, 15, and 20 represent mild, moderate, moderately severe, and severe depression. PHQ-9 >15 or suicidal ideation suggest depression sufficient for exclusion or removal from study.

  5. Language production as assessed by Morphosyntactic Generation (MorGen) Test

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    60 item assessment of word morphology (e.g., plurals, possessives) and modifiers (e.g., number, size, color). Each item is scored based on produced accurate descriptors of an image relative to a second reference image (e.g., patients see two trees, one larger than the other, and the phrase "little tree" is elicited). Patients are scored for objects correctly named (nouns) out of 60, instances of correct use of plural marker out of 31, instances of correct use of numbers out of 8, instances of correct modifiers denoting size out of 16, instances of correct modifiers denoting color out of 19, instances of correct modifiers denoting possessive markers out of 17, and instances of correctly named possessing individuals (proper names provided on screen) out of 17. These scores can then be interpreted separately or averaged to interpret a broad morphosyntactic accuracy score.

  6. Stroke severity as assessed by NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 5 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment, 20 weeks after computer-delivered naming treatment

    The NIHSS is a 15-item neurologic examination stroke scale used to evaluate the effect of acute cerebral infarction on the levels of consciousness, language, neglect, visual-field loss, extraocular movement, motor strength, ataxia, dysarthria, and sensory loss. A trained observer rates the patient's ability to answer questions and perform activities. Ratings for each item are scored with 3 to 5 grades with 0 as normal, and there is an allowance for untestable items.

  7. Post-stroke level of disability as assessed by modified Rankin Scale (mRS)

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    The mRS is a 6-level scale from "0-No symptoms" to "6-dead" used to evaluate the degree of disability in patients who have suffered a stroke.

  8. Stroke paresis severity as assessed by right hand strength

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Right hand strength assessment by dynamometer

  9. Stroke paresis severity as assessed by right hand dexterity

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Right hand dexterity assessment by 9 peg board test

  10. Change in new vocabulary items as assessed by lexical diversity included in story retelling of "Cinderella"

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Change in new vocabulary items will be counted for each noun, verb, and adjective in the Cinderella retelling. There is no maximum measure of lexical diversity, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.

  11. Change in incidence of new vocabulary items as assessed by lexical diversity included in story retelling of "Cinderella"

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Change in incidence of each new item will be counted for each noun, verb, and adjective in the Cinderella retelling. There is no maximum measure of lexical diversity, but norms are available to assist in the interpretation of this performance.

  12. Change in language production as assessed by speech errors produced during the story retelling of "Cinderella"

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Change in number of errors will be counted after each retelling is recorded

  13. Change in Language production as assessed by speech pauses produced during the story retelling of "Cinderella"

    Time frame: Baseline, 1 week after computer-delivered naming treatment

    Change in pauses will be counted after each retelling is recorded

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Argye Hillis-Trupe, MD

CONTACT

[email protected]

(410) 614-2381

Melissa D Stockbridge, PhD

CONTACT

[email protected]

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Johns Hopkins University

Other

Collaborators

  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
  • University of California, Irvine
  • University of South Carolina

Registry information

Official study title

Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA)

Acronym: ELISA

Important dates

Study start
2021
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2027
First posted
Feb 18, 2019
Registry last updated
Sep 23, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.