Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Active, Not Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07488390

Escape Room Simulation vs Case-Based Learning for Vital Sign Measurement in Nursing Students

This study compares two teaching methods for helping first-year nursing students learn how to select the correct anatomical site for vital sign measurement in different clinical conditions. Students will be randomly assigned to one of two groups: an escape room simulation group or a case-based learning group. Both groups will receive the same clinical content. Knowledge levels and anxiety will be measured before and after the intervention. Students in the escape room group will also complete scales measuring their gaming experience and satisfaction with learning. Additionally, focus group interviews will be conducted with escape room participants to explore their learning experiences in depth. The study uses a sequential explanatory mixed-methods design.

Active, Not Recruiting

This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University

Istanbul, Kayışdağı Caddesi, 34752, Turkey (Türkiye)

About this study

This sequential explanatory mixed-methods study aims to compare the effects of an escape room simulation and case-based learning on first-year nursing students' knowledge and anxiety regarding the selection of the correct anatomical site for vital sign measurement across different clinical conditions.

The study will be conducted at Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University, Department of Nursing and the CASE Advanced Simulation and Education Center during the 2025-2026 academic year fall semester.

Eligible participants are first-year nursing students enrolled in the "Health Assessment" course (N≈101). Participants will be randomly assigned using a computer-generated random number table to either the intervention group (escape room simulation) or the control group (case-based learning). Both groups will work through identical clinical case content involving conditions such as post-mastectomy status, arteriovenous fistula, hemiplegia, oxygen therapy, obesity, and nail polish presence.

In the intervention group, students will solve clinical scenarios through an escape room format in teams of 4-5, followed by a 30-minute structured debriefing session. In the control group, students will discuss the same cases in educator-guided sessions lasting 30-35 minutes.

Data will be collected using a Descriptive Characteristics Form, a Knowledge Test (10-item multiple choice, pre- and post-test), the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX), the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale, and the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Qualitative data will be collected via semi-structured focus group interviews with escape room participants and analyzed using content analysis.

Sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1 (α=0.05, power=0.80, Cohen's d=0.60), indicating a minimum of 45 participants per group (total n=90). The study will be conducted in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines and ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Enrolled as a first-year nursing student in the "Health Assessment" course at Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University in the 2025-2026 academic year
  • Having attended the vital signs lecture and laboratory session
  • Not having graduated from a vocational health high school
  • Willing to participate voluntarily

Exclusion criteria

  • Incomplete data collection forms
  • Absence from the post-test measurement (T2)
  • Voluntary withdrawal from the study

Treatment and study plan

Escape Room Simulation

Behavioral

A vital sign-themed escape room simulation in which students work in teams to solve clinical scenarios requiring selection of the correct anatomical measurement site. Followed by structured debriefing.

Case-Based Learning

Behavioral

Educator-guided group discussion of identical clinical cases involving vital sign measurement site selection under various clinical conditions.

Primary outcomes

  1. Knowledge Test Score

    Time frame: Baseline (pre-intervention) and immediately after intervention (approximately 1 hour)

    A 10-item multiple choice test assessing students' ability to select the correct anatomical site for vital sign measurement in different clinical conditions. Each correct answer scores 1 point (total: 0-10).

Secondary outcomes

  1. State Anxiety Level

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately after intervention

    Measured with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) State Anxiety subscale (20 items, score range 20-80).

Other outcomes

  1. Gameful Experience

    Time frame: Immediately after escape room simulation

    Measured with the Gameful Experience Scale (GAMEX); 27 items, 6 subscales, 5-point Likert scale. Applied to intervention group only.

  2. Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning

    Time frame: Immediately after escape room simulation

    Measured with the Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (12 items, two subscales: satisfaction and self-confidence, 5-point Likert scale). Applied to intervention group only.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Acibadem University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Selecting the Correct Anatomical Site for Vital Sign Measurement in Different Clinical Conditions: A Mixed-Methods Study Based on Escape Room Simulation Experience

Important dates

Study start
2026
Primary completion
2026
Study completion
2026
First posted
Mar 23, 2026
Registry last updated
Mar 23, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.