King Khalid University Hospital
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
NCT Number: NCT02037906
Research Problem: Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) dramatically changed the management of renal and ureteral calculus disease. In vitro studies suggest that progressive increase in lithotripter energy output voltage could produce the best overall stone comminution in comparison with constant or deescalating energy output. However, it is possible that the beneficial impact of slow rate SWL on comminution of stones and stone free rates has masked any marginal benefits for energy output escalation. The Escalating SW method adds the benefit of less renal tissue injury.
Research Significance:The present study will signifies and evaluates the stone free rates of three groups of patients with renal stones treated with different SWL energy outputs (Escalating, Constant and Reduction energy output).
Research Objectives: The aim of this research project is to study the effect of dose adjustment strategies on success rate of Shock Wave Lithotripsy in the clinical setting and to optimize the conditions for successful Shock Wave Lithotripsy.
Research Methodology: This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. 150 patients referred to the Shock wave lithotripsy unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized into three groups (Dose Escalation, Dose reduction and constant dose). Parameter of the three groups will be compared to detect the treatment difference.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me30 year–60 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
Escalating SW amplitude treatment protocols have been shown to be safe on long-term with less harm to kidney tissue. This clinical trial will be conducted at a tertiary care university hospital. All patients referred to the SWL unit will be evaluated for eligibility to be randomized. Randomization process "complete" or "unrestricted" randomization was used to allocate patients to the three arms of the clinical trial where one patient was randomly assigned to one of the three arms blindly.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Dose escalation, 1500 SW at 18 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following 1500 SW at 22 kv.
Constant dose at 20 kv
Dose reduction, 1500 SW at 22 kv, followed by 1500 SW at 20 kv and the following at 18 kv.
Time frame: 14 days after escalating shockwave lithotripsy
All patients undergo for imaging investigation of the kidneys, ureters, or bladder (KUB) plain x-ray film at day 14 to assess stone free rate. Stone free was defined as no stones or painless fragments less than 4mm. In additions all patients received pre and post shockwave lithotripsy renal ultrasound on day 1 prior and day 1 shockwave lithotripsy to evaluate for shockwave lithotripsy related hematoma formation.
Time frame: 14 days after constant shockwave lithotripsy
All patients undergo for imaging investigation of the kidneys, ureters, or bladder (KUB) plain x-ray film at day 14 to assess stone free rate. Stone free was defined as no stones or painless fragments less than 4mm. In additions all patients received pre and post shockwave lithotripsy renal ultrasound on day 1 prior and day 1 shockwave lithotripsy to evaluate for shockwave lithotripsy related hematoma formation.
Time frame: 14 days after reduction shockwave lithotripsy
All patients undergo for imaging investigation of the kidneys, ureters, or bladder (KUB) plain x-ray film at day 14 to assess stone free rate. Stone free was defined as no stones or painless fragments less than 4mm. In additions all patients received pre and post shockwave lithotripsy renal ultrasound on day 1 prior and day 1 shockwave lithotripsy to evaluate for shockwave lithotripsy related hematoma formation.
Princess Al-Johara Al-Ibrahim Cancer Research Center
Other
Comparison of Escalating, Constant and Reduction Energy Output in SWL for Renal Stones: Multi-arm Prospective Randomized Study.
Acronym: SWL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06615713
Calculi, Female Urogenital Diseases
Nadiād, India
View Trial DetailsNCT07522619
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07464717
Female Urogenital Diseases, Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications
Peshawar, KhyberPakhtunkhwa, Pakistan
View Trial DetailsNCT07360041
Calculi, Calculus
Cairo, Cairo Governorate, Egypt
View Trial Details