University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
NCT Number: NCT01598675
Many of the 780,000 people affected by stroke each year are left with slow, asymmetric walking patterns. The proposed project will evaluate the effectiveness of two competing motor learning approaches to restore symmetric gait for faster, more efficient, and safer walking.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599, United States
Walking after stroke is characterized by reduced gait speed and the presence of interlimb spatiotemporal asymmetry. These step length and stance time asymmetries can be energy inefficient, challenge balance control, increase the risk of falls and injury, and limit functional mobility. Current rehabilitation to improve gait is based on one of two competing motor learning strategies: minimizing or augmenting symmetry errors during training. Conventional rehabilitation often involves walking on a treadmill while therapists attempt to minimize symmetry errors during training. Although this approach can successfully improve gait speed, it does not produce long-term changes in symmetry. Conversely, augmenting or amplifying symmetry errors has been produced by walking on a split belt treadmill with the belts set at different fixed speeds. While this approach produced an 'after-effect' resulting in step length symmetry for short periods of time, with some evidence of long term learning in people with stroke, it had no influence on stance time asymmetry. The investigators propose that patients need real-time proprioceptive feedback of symmetry errors so that they are actively engaged in the learning process. For this project, the investigators developed and validated a novel, responsive, 'closed loop' control system, using a split-belt instrumented treadmill that continuously adjusts the difference in belt speeds to be proportional to the patient's current asymmetry. Using this system, the investigators can either augment or minimize asymmetry on a step-by-step basis to determine which motor learning strategy produces the largest improvement in overground spatiotemporal symmetry.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
18 sessions of training (3X/week). 20 minutes/session on treadmill; 10 minutes/session overground 70-75%HRmax. Control-Dual-belted treadmill belts respond to encourage symmetric gait
18 sessions of training (3X/week). 20 minutes/session on treadmill; 10 minutes/session overground 70-75%HRmax. Treadmill belts of dual-belted treadmill respond either to amplify asymmetric gait or encourage symmetric gait.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Spatiotemporal gait symmetry is calculated as a ratio of paretic to non-paretic measures after walking over a pressure sensitive mat.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Gait speed is measured in m/sec by having participants walk across a 14' pressure sensitive mat.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Balance will be assessed using the Berg Balance Scale, 4square step test, and the Functional Gait Assessment
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Endurance will be measured as the distance walked (in meters) during the 6 Minute Walk Test
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Quality of Life will be assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Metabolic efficiency is measured as the metabolic cost of transport (MCOT) using a portable metabolic cart to assess cardiorespiratory gas exchange during the 6 Minute Walk Test.
Time frame: participants will be followed for the duration of their training, expected to be about 6 weeks
Community ambulation is assessed using Step Watch Monitors (SAMs) which will be worn daily for a minimum of 7 days during waking hours.
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Gait speed is measured in m/sec by having participants walk across a 14' pressure sensitive mat.
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Balance will be assessed using the Berg Balance Scale, 4square step test, and the Functional Gait Assessment
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Endurance will be measured as the distance walked (in meters) during the 6 Minute Walk Test
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Quality of Life will be assessed using the Stroke Impact Scale
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Metabolic efficiency is measured as the metabolic cost of transport (MCOT) using a portable metabolic cart to assess cardiorespiratory gas exchange during the 6 Minute Walk Test.
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Community ambulation is assessed using Step Watch Monitors (SAMs) which will be worn daily for a minimum of 7 days during waking hours.
Time frame: participants will be followed for one month following the duration of their training (expected to be about 6 weeks) for a total of 10 weeks
Spatiotemporal gait symmetry is calculated as a ratio of paretic to non-paretic measures after walking over a pressure sensitive mat.
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02425345
Arterial Occlusive Diseases, Arteriosclerosis
View Trial DetailsNCT05589402
Bone Diseases, Brain Diseases
Harlingen, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06750692
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Afyonkarahisar, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial Details