Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
NCT Number: NCT01565538
Both pemetrexed and erlotinib are second-line treatment options for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer. It is controversial that whether it is necessary to detect epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status for the EGFR-targeted therapy after the failure of standard chemotherapy. The role of EGFR gene copy number as a predictive marker remains controversial. Therefore, we investigate the efficacy of erlotinib and pemetrexed as second-line therapy in treating in patients with EGFR wild-type and EGFR FISH-positive advanced lung adenocarcinoma.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060, China
Standard first-line treatment for advanced-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) usually consists of platinum-based doublet chemotherapy, but progression ultimately occurs for most patients. Second-line treatment options available to patients who suffer failure of first-line treatment include further chemotherapy (docetaxel and pemetrexed) or targeted therapy. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) show great efficacy in patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutation. High EGFR gene copy number was associated with great sensitivity and prolonged progression-free survival of NSCLC from EGFR-TKIs. This phase II study was designed to assess the efficacy and safety of erlotinib compared with pemetrexed as second-line treatment for EGFR wild-type and EGFR FISH-positive lung adenocarcinoma.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
150 mg Given orally
Other names: Tarceva
500mg/m2 Given IV
Other names: ALIMTA
Time frame: From the date of randomization to the date of tumour progression or death from any cause, assessed until at least 12 months after randomization.
Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: From the date of randomization, assessed every 6 weeks, until at least 12 months after randomization.
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by CT: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.
Time frame: From date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, assessed until at least 12 months after randomization.
Si-Yu Wang
Other
A Randomized Phase II Trial of Erlotinib Versus Pemetrexed as Second-Line Therapy in Treating Patients With Advanced EGFR Wild-Type and EGFR FISH-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02922764
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05337163
Actinomycetales Infections, Acute Bronchitis
Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
View Trial DetailsNCT04028479
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02664181
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details