Erlotinib Hydrochloride
DrugGiven PO
Other names: CP 358, CP-358, Cp-358,774, CP358, OSI 774, OSI-774, OSI774, Tarceva
NCT Number: NCT02535338
This phase I/II trial studies the side effects and best dose of onalespib lactate when given together with erlotinib hydrochloride and to see how well they work in treating patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer that has come back (recurrent) or has spread to other places in the body (metastatic). Erlotinib hydrochloride and onalespib lactate may stop the growth of tumor cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cell growth.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 1 / Phase 2
City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, California, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To determine the safety and tolerability of erlotinib hydrochloride (erlotinib) and onalespib lactate (onalespib) in patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (PHASE I) II. To preliminarily assess efficacy of combination erlotinib and onalespib at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) determined in the phase I portion of the study in EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients who have not had a complete or partial response by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 to frontline erlotinib after a minimum of 12 weeks on erlotinib. (PHASE II, COHORT A) III. To preliminarily assess efficacy of combination erlotinib and onalespib at the RP2D in NSCLC patients whose tumor harbors an EGFR exon 20 insertion (an EGFR mutation not typically responsive to single agent erlotinib). (PHASE II, COHORT B)
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To observe and record anti-tumor activity (primary aim phase II, secondary aim phase I).
II. To evaluate in a preliminary manner the progression-free survival (PFS) and disease control rate (DCR) of patients treated with erlotinib/onalespib.
III. To characterize the pharmacokinetics of the above drug combinations at the recommended phase II dose (RP2D).
TERTIARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To explore plasma EGFR-mutant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) as a biomarker by detecting changes in plasma EGFR-mutant DNA levels (including plasma EGFR-T790M) and new mutations that may represent resistance to treatment.
II. To demonstrate knockdown of Hsp90 client oncoproteins via treatment with erlotinib and onalespib by multiplexed immunofluorescence in serial tumor biopsies.
III. To establish patient derived xenotransplant models in EGFR-mutated NSCLC with a focus on tumors that lack response to single agent erlotinib and in patients with tumors harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions.
OUTLINE: This is a phase I, dose-escalation study of onalespib lactate followed by a phase II study.
Patients receive erlotinib hydrochloride orally (PO) daily and onalespib lactate intravenously (IV) over 1 hour on days 1, 8, and 15. Treatment repeats every 28 days for at least 3 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up every 12 weeks for 1 year and then annually thereafter.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Given PO
Other names: CP 358, CP-358, Cp-358,774, CP358, OSI 774, OSI-774, OSI774, Tarceva
Correlative studies
Given IV
Other names: AT-13387 Lactate, ATI-13387A, ATI-13387AU
Correlative studies
Time frame: 28 days from the start of treatment.
Adverse events were graded by CTCAE, v4. DLTs defined as ≥Gr 3 non-hematologic toxicity except nausea, vomiting, or diarrhea that could be controlled by appropriate medical intervention or prophylaxis and that resolved within 48 hours, except electrolyte toxicities that can be corrected within 48 hours. Gr 3 rash attributed to the combination was considered a DLT if it remained Gr 3 despite maximal medical management for > 72 hours. Hematologic toxicities qualifying as DLTs included febrile neutropenia; Gr 4 neutropenia for > 7 days or thrombocytopenia < 25,000/mm3 (Gr 4) if associated with a bleeding event that did not result in hemodynamic instability but required an elective platelet transfusion; or a life-threatening bleeding event that resulted in urgent intervention and admission to an intensive care unit. Delay in starting cycle 2 of ≥14 days due to toxicity related to one or more protocol drugs was also considered a DLT. The first 28-day cycle was considered the DLT period.
Time frame: 28 days from start of treatment.
The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of Onalespib IV in combination with 150 mg Erlotinib PO daily is based on toxicities observed during the first cycle and is defined as the highest dose tested in which fewer than 33% of patients experience an attributable DLT to the study drug, when at least 6 patients are treated at that dose and are evaluable for toxicity. Dose escalations proceeded according to a standard 3+3 design.
Time frame: Up to 4 weeks
During the first course of therapy patients will be monitored for dose-limiting toxicities (DLT). Dose escalation will follow a 3+3 design, motivated by the desire to limit the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity to the lowest feasible levels and determine the recommended phase II dose. This outcome measure has been addressed in primary outcome measures 1 & 2.
Time frame: Up to at least 1 year
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
Time frame: From start of treatment to time of progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first, assessed up to at least 1 year
Progression-free survival will be summarized as time from first protocol treatment until progression or death from any cause, using the product-limit Kaplan-Meier estimator. Progression is defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.
Time frame: Up to at least 1 year
Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI:
Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), >=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Nih
A Phase 1/2 Trial of Erlotinib and Onalespib Lactate in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01281124
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03191149
Advanced Lung Non-Small Cell Carcinoma, Bronchial Neoplasms
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02642042
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Anchorage, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01708954
Bronchial Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Bronchogenic
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details