Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT06954051

ERFs Game-based Assessment in AYAs: Validation of Game-based Assessment of Emotion Regulation Abilities

This activity will have the objective of establishing the validity of in-game emotion regulation abilities assessment for adolescents and young adults.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

10 year–24 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Babes-Bolyai University

Cluj-Napoca, Cluj, 400015, Romania

About this study

Each level of the REThink LIFE online game dedicated to training a specific ER skill has an assessment task for emotion recognition, stress reactivity, mindfulness and positive attention abilities. The aim of this study will be to investigate the validity of in-game performance measurements or scores as indicators of adolescents and young adults' emotion regulation abilities.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • adolescents and young adults with between 10 and 24 years old provided with written parental consent where applicable

Exclusion criteria

  • intellectual disability or physical limitations precluded the use of the computer program

Treatment and study plan

REThink Life

Other

REThink Life is a therapeutic game developed by David and collaborators (2019) and it is composed of four levels, each training a different emotion regulation ability (emotion recognition, mindfulness, distinguishing between rational and irrational thoughts, and positive attention bias).

Primary outcomes

  1. Emotion regulation

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ-short) is an 18-item scale assessing nine different emotion regulation strategies, namely Self-blame, Other-blame, Rumination, Catastrophizing, Positive refocusing, Planning, Positive reappraisal, Putting into perspective and Acceptance. Children and adolescents were asked to express the frequency of using each strategy on a 5-point Likert-type scale, from 1 ("almost never") to 5 ("almost always"). Higher scores on adaptive strategies (e.g., positive reappraisal, refocus on planning, positive refocusing, putting into perspective, acceptance) are equivalent to a better outcome (more adaptive coping). Higher scores on maladaptive strategies (e.g., rumination, catastrophizing, self-blame, other-blame) are equivalent to worse outcomes (less adaptive coping).

  2. Behavioral difficulties

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) is a brief behavioural screening questionnaire for children aged 2 to 17 years old, encompassing emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity/inattention, peer relationship problems, and prosocial behavior.

    Total difficulties score: Sum of all subscales except Prosocial → Range: 0 to 40. Prosocial score is reported separately → Range: 0 to 10. Higher scores on total difficulties and the four problem subscales are equivalent to worse outcomes. Higher scores on the prosocial subscale are equivalent to better outcomes.

  3. Stress

    Time frame: Baseline

    The Adolescent Stress Scale (ADOSS) will be used to capture students' level of stress in the following domains: personal, academic, family, and social. Total score ranges from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating higher levels of stress.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Babes-Bolyai University

Other

Collaborators

  • The Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding

Registry information

Official study title

Validation of Game-based Assessment of Emotion Regulation Abilities Using the REThink Life Online Game in a Population of Adolescents and Young Adults

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2025
Study completion
2025
First posted
May 1, 2025
Registry last updated
Aug 28, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.