St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
NCT Number: NCT03691922
Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is a common and minimally invasive procedure utilized for different shoulder pathologies, but it is often associated with moderate to severe postoperative pain that may interfere with patients' well-being and course of recovery. By using an effective analgesic technique with few side effects, a patient may experience less pain after surgery, have a shortened hospital stay, and endure less nausea, vomiting, or excessive drowsiness that are associated with the use of opioids to manage postoperative pain. Periarticular infiltration (PAI) with local anesthetic (LA) has been used for shoulder surgery pain management, but the more effective interscalene nerve block (ISNB) is the current gold standard analgesic modality despite risk of significant side effects including diaphragm paralysis and rebound pain. In this study, the investigators want to look at the effectiveness and safety profile of a novel technique for pain management after shoulder surgery that has the potential to provide successful pain relief with minimal risk of side effects. Half of the patients will be randomly selected to receive the novel nerve block called the Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block while the other half will receive a more standard PAI of local anesthetic to numb the shoulder. Patients' pain intensity and opioid consumption in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) as well as during the first 24 hours after surgery will be evaluated. Any complications from the interventions will also be noted. The investigators predict that the ESP block will provide superior analgesia compared to PAI for these shoulder arthroscopy patients.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6, Canada
The use of opioids to manage immediate postoperative pain is frequently associated with nausea, vomiting, respiratory depression, hormonal effects and dysphoria. As such, achieving pain control while minimizing opioid use is critical, since more than 60% of unplanned prolonged hospitalizations and hospital readmissions are thought to be related to inadequate pain control or to side effects of opioids. A number of techniques have been used to achieve good pain control after arthroscopic shoulder surgery, including periarticular infiltration (PAI) with local anesthetic (LA) and regional anesthetic nerve blocks. Although PAI in the shoulder has been shown to decrease shoulder pain and opioid consumption, it is not as effective as regional blocks such as the interscalene nerve block (ISNB), which is the current gold standard. Nevertheless, the ISNB is potentially associated with significant side effects including persistent neurologic complications, rebound pain, phrenic nerve palsy, respiratory distress, cardiac arrest pneumothorax and central nerve toxicity. In view of this, investigating alternate regional blocks having the potential for good pain relief with minimal side effects is important. The Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block can be considered as a modification of thoracic paravertebral block (PVB) that blocks thoracic spinal nerves using injections outside of the conventional paravertebral space. It is performed under ultrasound (US) by injecting local anesthetic deep to the erector spinae muscle at the interfascial space between either the erector spinae muscle and the rhomboid major muscle (higher up), or between the erector spinae muscle and the external intercostal muscles, at lower sites. Cadaveric studies of ultrasound-guided ESP blocks with methylene blue dye and subsequent dissection, as well an ESP block with a dye mixture and CT scanning demonstrated that when injecting deep into the erector spinae, the block likely affects the ventral and dorsal rami leading to the sensory blockade. The advantages include its simplicity and safety by limiting the risk of nerve damage and pneumothorax. Various case reports have demonstrated the ESP block to be successful for abdominal, breast and axillary, and other surgery types, and a recent case report described the successful management of chronic shoulder pain without motor blockade, with ESP performed at T3 level. The investigators conducted a systematic review via Pubmed to identify studies that have utilized ESP for post-surgical shoulder pain. Out of 77 reports, the investigators did not identify any comparative studies looking at the potential of ESP for shoulder surgery pain. The investigators also looked into ongoing and proposed trials of ESP by looking into clinicaltrials.gov. The investigators identified 21 studies including some randomized controlled trials (RCT) for thoracic surgery and general surgery population, but none for shoulder surgeries. Given the importance of providing adequate analgesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery and lack of consensus amongst surgeons and anesthesiologists for the optimal analgesic technique, this trial will help establish the effectiveness of the ESP block in pain control after shoulder arthroscopy and define its safety profile. The results of this trial will allow the clinician to inform patients accurately regarding the benefits and risks of the block and thus guide the clinical practice of this block for shoulder arthroscopy. If proven to be effective, it may be used as an alternative to ISNB, especially in cases where ISNB is contraindicated.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Other names: 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 mcg/mL of epinephrine & PAI with 30 mL of saline
Other names: ESP block with 30 mL of saline & PAI with 30 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine with 5 mcg/mL of epinephrine
Time frame: At 30 minutes post-admission to recovery room
Using the patient-reported numeric rating scale (0-10) (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: At 5 hours post-operatively
Using the patient-reported numeric rating scale (0-10) (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable).
Time frame: At 30 minutes post-admission to recovery room and 5 hours post-operatively
Using the patient-reported numeric rating scale (0-10). (0 is no pain and 10 is worst pain imaginable). Participants will be asked to sit up from lying down position.
Time frame: At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
All opioids administered in recovery room and day surgery unit will be converted into Morphine Equivalent Units per patient according to accepted standards.
Time frame: At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
Using a 0-3 scale (0 is none and 3 severe nausea-vomiting)
Time frame: At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
Using a 0-3 scale (0 is none and 3 severe itching)
Time frame: 30 minutes post-admission to recovery room
Diagnosed based on the findings in an anterior posterior chest using ultrasound , with the criteria of "a right hemidiaphragm sitting >2 cm higher than its left counterpart or a left hemidiaphragm sitting equal or higher than the right hemidiaphragm".
Time frame: At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
Opioids discontinued by the Acute Pain Service or recovery room nursing due to concerns of respiratory depression by nursing staff.
Time frame: At 2 hours post-operatively and 5 hours post-operatively
Based on clinical symptoms and signs of local anesthetic toxicity as diagnosed by the attending physician.
Time frame: At 30 minutes post-admission to recovery room
Seven sensory dermatomes corresponding to shoulder and upper arm and their blockade to cold sensation will be noted. The extent of blockade between the two groups will be compared by their median and range.
Time frame: At 5 hours post-operatively and 24 hours post-operatively
Using a 7-item Likert scale (1 is extremely satisfied and 7 is extremely dissatisfied)
McMaster University
Other
Randomized Control Trial of Ultrasound-Guided Erector Spinae Block Versus Shoulder Periarticular Anesthetic Infiltration for Pain Control After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07253740
Agnosia, Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery
Erzurum, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07090733
Agnosia, Analgesia
Tanta, El-Gharbia, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT07640464
Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, Diaphragmatic Excursion
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT06826846
Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery, Neurologic Manifestations
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial Details