Wuhan No.1 Hospital (Wuhan Hospital of Traditional Chinese & Western Medicine)
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
NCT Number: NCT07064980
This study is a prospective, randomized controlled trial designed to compare the effectiveness and safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage (PTBD) for the treatment of severe acute cholangitis caused by common bile duct stones. The primary goal is to determine which emergency drainage procedure leads to faster patient recovery, specifically by evaluating the length of hospital stay, without increasing complication rates.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Wuhan, Hubei, 430030, China
Severe acute cholangitis (AC) due to common bile duct stones is a life-threatening condition requiring urgent biliary decompression. While both ERCP and PTBD are established minimally invasive options, the optimal choice remains under discussion. This single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial was conducted to compare these two interventions. A total of 126 patients with severe AC (Tokyo Guidelines 2018 Grade II or III) were randomized to either the ERCP group (n=63) or the PTBD group (n=63). Randomization was performed using a computer-generated sequence with concealed allocation. While operators could not be blinded, outcome assessors and data analysts were. The study hypothesis is that ERCP, as a more direct route for potential stone removal and drainage, may facilitate a quicker overall recovery compared to PTBD. The trial evaluates procedural outcomes, recovery metrics, therapeutic efficacy, inflammatory markers, and safety profiles to provide evidence for clinical decision-making.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Performed under intravenous anesthesia. A duodenoscope was advanced to the major duodenal papilla. After cannulation and cholangiography, purulent bile was aspirated. Biliary sphincterotomy was performed in most patients (95.2%), followed by stone extraction using a balloon catheter or basket. A 7-10 Fr nasobiliary tube was placed for drainage in all patients. Prophylactic rectal indomethacin (100mg) was also administered.
Performed under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation and ultrasound guidance. An 18G needle was used to puncture a dilated intrahepatic bile duct. After guidewire placement, an 8-10 Fr drainage catheter was inserted for either internal-external drainage (if the guidewire could pass into the duodenum) or purely external biliary drainage.
Time frame: At hospital discharge (up to approximately 3-4 weeks post-procedure).
The total number of days from hospital admission to discharge.
Time frame: From date of procedure until hospital discharge (estimated maximum of 4 weeks).
Time in days from the procedure until the patient is first able to walk.
Time frame: Measured intraoperatively
Time in minutes from scope insertion/skin puncture to the end of drainage placement.
Time frame: From date of procedure until hospital discharge (estimated maximum of 4 weeks).
Time in hours or days from the procedure until the first flatus or bowel movement.
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 72 hours post-procedure, and 3 months post-treatment.
Change from baseline in serum levels of Interleukin-6 (IL-6), Interleukin-1 (IL-1), Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha (TNF-α), and C-reactive protein (CRP).
Time frame: Baseline (pre-treatment), 72 hours post-procedure, and 3 months post-treatment.
Change from baseline in pain severity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), scored 0-10.
Time frame: Assessed at 24 hours post-procedure.
Assessed as Significant Effect, Effective, or Ineffective based on resolution of biliary obstruction and clinical symptoms within 24 hours. The total effective rate is calculated as (Significant + Effective) / Total cases.
Time frame: up to 3 months post-procedure.
Number of participants experiencing adverse events, including post-ERCP pancreatitis, abdominal infection, gastrointestinal bleeding, bile leakage, liver damage, and procedure-specific complications.
Wuhan Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital
Other
Analysis of the Effectiveness and Safety of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography Versus Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage in Severe Acute Cholangitis Caused by Common Bile Duct Stones
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.