Equity Using Interventions for Pain and Depression - Pilot Study

The pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely), of interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

The pain interference score averages seven ratings, 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (interferes completely), of interference with general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, and enjoyment of life.

The PHQ-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity. The PHQ-8 is scored by assigning a value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to each of the 8 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate worse depression severity.

The PHQ-8 is a widely-used, validated 8-item measure of depression severity. The PHQ-8 is scored by assigning a value of 0 (not at all) to 3 (nearly every day) to each of the 8 items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate worse depression severity.

Anxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is scored by assigning a value of 0 to 3 to each of the seven items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The total score indicates the severity of anxiety symptoms (higher scores indicating a worse outcome).

Anxiety will be measured with the 7 item Generalized Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD-7). The GAD-7 is scored by assigning a value of 0 to 3 to each of the seven items, with a total score ranging from 0 to 21. The total score indicates the severity of anxiety symptoms (higher scores indicating a worse outcome).

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

The Pain Catastrophizing Scale is a 13-item scale that assesses catastrophizing-a cognitive-emotional factor that predicts poor treatment response. The scale uses a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all) to 4 (all the time) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 52. Higher scores indicate a worse outcome.

Patient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Each item is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater engagement.

Patient engagement will be measured with the 12-item Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) Measure, which has 3 subscales: 1) commitment to manage one's health, 2) informed choice, and 3) confidence to participate in treatment decisions. Each item is assessed on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) with a total score ranging from 0 to 48. Higher scores indicate greater engagement.

The NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer "yes" will be summed for analyses.

The NSCAP asks about 9 nonpharmacological treatment (NPT) modalities and assesses details of use such as frequency, location/source of service, and patients' judgments of effectiveness. Space is also provided for other NPTs that are used but not listed. The number of modalities for which patients answer "yes" will be summed for analyses.

Communication self-efficacy will be measured with this 5-item scale that measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit. Higher scores indicate greater communication self-efficacy. The scale uses ratings from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 50.

Communication self-efficacy will be measured with this 5-item scale that measures patients' self-efficacy in obtaining medical information and getting their most important health concern discussed in a clinic visit. Higher scores indicate greater communication self-efficacy. The scale uses ratings from 0 (not at all confident) to 10 (extremely confident) for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 50.

Shared decision making will be measured with CollaboRATE, a 3-item measure assessing provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making during a recent appointment. The CollaboRATE scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "No effort was made (0)" to "Every effort was made (4)" for each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making.

Shared decision making will be measured with CollaboRATE, a 3-item measure assessing provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making during a recent appointment. The CollaboRATE scale uses a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from "No effort was made (0)" to "Every effort was made (4)" or each item with a total score ranging from 0 to 12. Higher scores indicate higher provider effort from the patient's perspective to engage in shared-decision making.

The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form assesses patient-provider agreement on treatment goals, collaboration to achieve these goals, and degree of emotional bond (liking and trust) between patients and providers. The scale uses ratings from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) for each item with a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater alliance between patient and provider.

The Working Alliance Inventory (WAI) Client Short Form assesses patient-provider agreement on treatment goals, collaboration to achieve these goals, and degree of emotional bond (liking and trust) between patients and providers. The scale uses ratings from 1 (Never) to 7 (Always) or each item with a total score ranging from 12 to 84. Higher scores indicate greater alliance between patient and provider.