ISA specific
DrugISA specific interventions will be listed in their protocols.
NCT Number: NCT05476276
This is a Platform Protocol to perform Phase II clinical trials in The Early Phase Pain Investigation Clinical Network (EPPIC-Net), under The Helping to End Addiction Long-termSM Initiative, or NIH HEAL InitiativeSM, related to the treatment of Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (PDPN) in a platform setting to test multiple assets under a single protocol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
University of California, San Diego, San Diego, California, United States
This is a Platform Protocol that allows evaluation of more than one treatment in a single trial structure, to be run within EPPIC-Net. Instead of testing individual assets in a series of clinical trials, this Platform Protocol sets out the framework for testing multiple assets related to PDPN. This provides an efficient approach to evaluate multiple therapies under a single infrastructure in a timely fashion. The Platform Protocol also allows efficiencies by creating the possibility of sharing information across assets, such as data from control conditions.
This Platform Protocol is for a platform design to allow for the testing of multiple assets. Some platform trials allow direct comparisons of competing therapies for the same condition. However, for this EPPIC-Net platform trial, there will not be direct comparisons of assets to one another. Instead, assets will only be compared to a placebo. This is in service to the EPPIC-Net primary goal of accelerating the development of pain treatment because, based on feedback from asset-holders, the possibility of comparison of assets to one another or to an active drug would be a deterrent for asset-holders' participation in EPPIC-Net.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
3.1. Platform Protocol Inclusion Criteria (To be used in conjunction with ISA-specific criteria. Note, some ISA criteria may be more stringent than Platform criteria; always follow the more stringent criteria when determining eligibility.)
Participants must meet all of the following inclusion criteria:
i. "Yes" is checked at least once under Question 3 of the DN4 which queries hypoesthesia to touch and pinprick.
ii. At least one score of "reduced" or "absent" on the right AND at least one score of "reduced" or "absent" on the left in any of the following items from the EPPIC-Net Neuropathy Exam:
a. Are not of childbearing potential, defined as one or more of the following: i. Post-menopausal for at least 1 year ii. Surgically sterile (bilateral tubal ligation, bilateral oophorectomy, or hysterectomy) iii. XY genotype iv. Turner syndrome v. Uterine agenesis. b. Are completely abstinent from sexual activity capable of resulting in pregnancy (as part of their preferred and usual lifestyle). This will include females whose sole sexual partner is a male who has undergone surgical sterilization or vasectomy.
c. Women of childbearing potential will agree to practice an effective form of two types of birth control, which are defined as those, alone or in combination, that result in a low failure rate (i.e., less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly. This must be done before, throughout, and for 30 days after the last dose of DB study drug. Acceptable methods are: i. Hormonal methods such as the vaginal ring, or oral, implantable, injectable, or transdermal contraceptives for a minimum of 1 full cycle (based on the participant's usual menstrual cycle period) before study drug administration.
ii. Intrauterine device. iii. Barrier method of contraception: condoms with or without a spermicidal agent, diaphragm or cervical cap with spermicide
3.2. Platform Protocol Exclusion Criteria (To be used in conjunction with ISA-specific criteria; note, some ISA criteria may be more stringent than Platform criteria; always follow the more stringent criteria when determining eligibility)
Please note that some of the below criteria which depend on clinical judgment require contacting the MM. Participants must not meet any of the following exclusion criteria, organized by category:
3.2.1. Neuropathy Confound Exclusion Criteria
3.2.2. Medication/Treatment Exclusion Criteria
i. Non-pharmacological treatment for conditions other than PDPN is allowed without restriction.
3.2.3. Medical Exclusion Criteria
Individuals whose judgment has been impaired by their physical, mental, or socio-economical condition and those incapable of giving informed consent.
ISA specific interventions will be listed in their protocols.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
Typically, the primary efficacy endpoint for this Platform Protocol will be based on the daily 0-10 pain NRS. Participants will respond to the following every evening before going to bed:
Typically, the primary efficacy endpoint for this Platform Protocol will be based on the daily 0-10 pain NRS. Participants will respond to the following every evening before going to bed:
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The PEG is a three-item (each scored 0-10) multidimensional pain measure designed and validated for use in primary care and other ambulatory clinic patients, as a practical and useful tool to improve assessment and monitoring of chronic pain in primary care.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
Catastrophizing is a pain-specific psychosocial construct comprising cognitive and emotional processes such as helplessness, pessimism, rumination about pain-related symptoms, and magnification of pain reports. The PCS-SF6 is a 6-item, self-report measure of catastrophic thinking associated with pain. Scores range from 0-24, with higher scores indicating more catastrophizing.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Functioning short form is a 6-item scale that is widely used in pain research. It is a unidimensional scale that shows broad coverage of the physical function construct, good construct validity, and high levels of temporal stability. The PROMIS Physical Function Scale is expressed as a T-score, with a population mean of 50 and SD of 10. Higher scores represent better physical functioning; possible T scores in this distribution range from 21 to 59 (PROMIS, 2020).
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The 2-item PHQ-2 is a brief depression screening tool that correlates strongly with PHQ-9 scores and shows good sensitivity for identifying individuals with depressive disorders in the general population in a variety of medical samples. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating more depressive symptomatology.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The GAD-2 is a 2-item screening tool that is widely used to screen for clinically significant anxiety symptoms and anxiety disorders in clinical settings. It shows good sensitivity and specificity as a screening tool for anxiety disorders. Scores range from 0-6, with higher scores indicating more anxiety symptomatology.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The PGIC is a single-item measure of patient-reported improvement that is widely used as a general outcome measure in studies of chronic pain patients. It is often used as an index of treatment-associated change, and patient-reported improvements in the form of PGIC scores correlate robustly with significant improvement in pain intensity, pain interference with activities of daily living, mood, and quality of life (Perrot and Lanteri-Minet, 2019).
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The TAPS-1 is the screening component of the TAPS tool and consists of a single stem question with four items covering the frequency of past-12-month use of tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drugs, and non-medical use of prescription medications. Scores range from 0-4; higher scores indicate a higher likelihood of problematic substance use. The TAPS-1 shows good sensitivity and specificity for identifying substance use disorders.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance short form is a convenient 6-item scale that correlates strongly with the longer forms. The PROMIS Sleep Disturbance Scale is expressed as a T-score, with a population mean of 50 and standard deviation (SD) of 10. Possible T scores in this distribution range from 31.7 to 76.1 (PROMIS, 2021).
Time frame: Past 24 hours
A single-item scale measuring the duration of actual sleep a participant has gotten, on average, over the past month. Numerical responses will be provided in hours and minutes.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The OUQ is an indicator of past or present use of any of the listed opioid medications. There are a total of three yes/no items where a yes indicates the use of such medications
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The Norfolk QOL-DN is a validated 47-item, patient-reported outcome measure, sensitive to the different features of diabetic neuropathy (DN) including small fiber, large fiber, and autonomic function.
Time frame: Past 24 hours
The neuropathy examination will be a single consolidated procedure consisting of visual inspection of the feet, brief distal motor exam, ankle and knee deep tendon reflexes, and a standardized sensory exam. This single exam will collect all the data needed to calculate several common scores including: the Michigan Neuropathy Screening Instrument (MNSI) Part B (Feldman et al., 1994; Herman et al., 2012), the Utah Early Neuropathy Scale (UENS) (Singleton et al., 2008), and the Toronto Clinical Scoring System (Toronto CSS) (Bril & Perkins, 2002). Disambiguation: Toronto CSS is the name given to the scale initially. In a subsequent publication (Bril et al, 2008) this scale is referred to as the Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (TCNS), and its modification as the modified Toronto Clinical Neuropathy Score (mTCNS).
James P. Rathmell, MD
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03228420
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Bradenton, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05937984
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
View Trial DetailsNCT05480228
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06524284
Diabetes Complications, Diabetes Mellitus
Vught, Netherlands
View Trial Details