Karolinska University Hospital
Stockholm, Sweden
NCT Number: NCT03847051
This study aims to assess the diagnostic feasibility and diagnostic performance of a new fast MR sequence EPIMix for neuroradiological evaluation in comparison to computed tomography of brain in pediatric population.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me4 year–18 year
All sexes
Observational
Stockholm, Sweden
The study aims to assess the feasibility of fast MR sequence for neuroradiological evaluation in comparison to computed tomography of brain in pediatric population. Imaging quality is analysed with regards to artefacts and lesion conspicuity as well as its diagnostic potential in rendering a probable diagnosis. The primary study aim is to define feasibility and the AUC for diagnostic performance of minute MRI compared to computed tomography.
Included patients are children age 4-18 with suspicion of cerebral pathology with referral to elective computed tomography of the brain.
Study participants are in addition to computed tomography investigated during same day at 3T MR.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Brain MRI without intravenous contrast
Time frame: At 0 hours
Number of aborted MR
Time frame: At 0 hours
Diagnostic accuracy to categorize scan as normal or abnormal on a five point Likert scale (1 - definitely normal, 2 - Probably normal, 3 - Indeterminate, 4 - Probably abnormal, 5 - Definitely abnormal) compared to abnormal/normal brain CT.
Time frame: At 0 hours
Classification into disease categories (Neoplastic, Ischemic, Hemorrhagic, Infection, Neuroinflammation, Hydrocephalus, Congenital malformation, Indeterminate)
Time frame: At 0 hours
Anatomical localization of abnormality (Cerebrum, Cerebellum, Brainstem, Intraventricular, Subarachnoid space including basal cisterns, Intra-orbital, Skull/Skull base/dural, Other)
Time frame: At 0 hours
Diagnostic imaging quality (5 point Likert scale; 1 - Excellent diagnostic imaging quality, 2 - Good diagnostic imaging quality, 3 - Sufficient diagnostic imaging quality, 4 - Restricted diagnostic imaging quality, 5 - Poor diagnostic imaging quality)
Time frame: At 0 hours
For example effect on brain parenchyma and size
Time frame: At 0 hours
Five point Likert scale (Very confident, Predominantly confident, Fairly confident, Only slightly confident, Not at all confident)
Time frame: At 0 hours
Text (one sentence summary of the finding including type of lesion and location)
Time frame: At 0 hours
A list of diseases. Number of positive versus negative cases for each investigation (including: Tumor, Abscess, Parenchymal Haemorrhage, Acute Ischemia, Hydrocephalus, Neuroinflammation, Subarachnoid hemorrhage, Extraaxial fluid collection)
Time frame: At 0 hours
Artefacts and impact (Motion, Beam hardening, Other) defined as; Not present, Not affecting diagnostic confidence, Degrading diagnostic confidence)
Karolinska University Hospital
Other
EPIMix (Echo Planar Imaging Mix) Versus CT Brain Pediatric Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04992195
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Thromboembolism
Hong Kong
View Trial DetailsNCT05318976
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
View Trial DetailsNCT06249776
Brain Diseases, Brain Infarction
Ahmedabad, Gujarat, India
View Trial DetailsNCT06809959
Brain Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial Details