administration of riboflavin for epi-off cross-linking
Procedureriboflavin 0.1% in 20% dextran solution
NCT Number: NCT03598634
To evaluate two different techniques of cross linking: standard epithelium off (CXL epi off) versus trans-epithelial (CXL epi on) cross linking in patient with progressive keratoconus.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–40 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
The aim of the study is to evaluate two different techniques of cross linking: standard epithelium off (CXL epi off) versus trans-epithelial (CXL epi on) cross linking in patient with progressive keratoconus.
Forty eyes from 32 patients with progressive keratoconus were prospectively enrolled from June 2014 to June 2015 in this non-blinded, randomized comparative study. Twenty eyes were treated by CXL epi off and 20 by CLX epi on, randomly assigned and followed for 2 years. All patients underwent a complete ophthalmologic testing that included uncorrected and best corrected visual acuity, central and peripheral corneal thickness, corneal astigmatism, simulated maximum, minimum, and average keratometry, corneal confocal microscopy, Schirmer I and break-up time (BUT) tests, and the Ocular Surface Disease Index. Intra-and postoperative complications were recorded. The solution used for CXL epi off comprised riboflavin 0.1% and dextran 20.0% (Ricrolin), whereas the solution for CXL epi on (Ricrolin, TE) comprised riboflavin 0.1%, dextran 15.0%, trometamol (Tris), and ethylene-diamine-tetra-acetic acid. Ultraviolet-A treatment was performed with UV-X System at 3 mW/cm2.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
riboflavin 0.1% in 20% dextran solution
riboflavin 0.1% in 15% dextran solution supplemented with tris-hydroxymethylaminomethane and sodium ethylenediminetetraacetic acid
Time frame: up to 48 months from the recruitment
University of Molise
Other
Epi Off Versus Epi on Corneal Collagen Cross-linking in Keratoconus Patients: a Comparative Study Throught 2 Years Follow-up
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06818461
Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases
Mohandessin, Giza Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT06100939
Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases
Rowland Heights, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06100952
Corneal Diseases, Eye Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04418999
Allergy, Corneal Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial Details