Epcoritamab
DrugT-cell bispecific antibody, via subcutaneous injection
Other names: DuoBody-CD3xCD20, GEN3013
NCT Number: NCT05783609
The purpose of this study is to determine how effective and safe the combination of rituximab and epcoritamab is in treating patients with Follicular Lymphoma (FL) and who have not received other treatments for their lymphoma.
The names of the study drugs involved in this study are:
* Rituximab (a type of monoclonal antibody therapy) * Epcoritamab (a T-cell bispecific antibody)
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 2
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
This is an open-label, multicenter, phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epcoritamab and rituximab for patients with untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). Epcoritamab brings T cells and follicular lymphoma cells close together and activates the T cells to kill the lymphoma cells. Rituximab activates the immune system to kill the lymphoma cells.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has not approved epcoritamab as a treatment for any disease.
The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved rituximab as a treatment option for follicular lymphoma (FL).
The research study procedures include screening for eligibility, study treatment with evaluations, blood tests, bone marrow biopsies, and Computerized Tomography (CT) scans and Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scans.
Participants will receive study treatment for approximately 9-10 months and will be followed for up to 10 years.
It is expected that about 100 people will take part in this research study, 35 participants in the initial cohort and 65 patients in the expansion cohort.
Genmab and AbbVie are supporting this research study by providing one of the study drugs, Epcoritamab. Genmab is providing funding for the study.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
T-cell bispecific antibody, via subcutaneous injection
Other names: DuoBody-CD3xCD20, GEN3013
Chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, via IV infusion
Other names: Rituxan, MabThera
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days
EOT CMR rate defined as the proportion of participants achieving CR per PET/CT Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol appendix B) at the EOT assessment: PET-CT, score 1, 2, or 3 with or without a residual mass on a 5-point scale (5PS) among all patients and separately in Cohorts A and B.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days
Best PMR rate defined as the proportion of participants achieving PR per Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol appendix B) ever on treatment: PET-CT Score 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es) of any size or on CT, ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of up to 6 target measurable nodes and extranodal sites; no increase in non-measured lesions; spleen if enlarged must have regressed by >50% in length beyond normal.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days
Best OMR rate defined as the proportion of participants achieving CR or partial response (PR) per Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol appendix B) ever on treatment.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days
EOT PMR rate defined as the proportion of participants achieving PR per PET/CT Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol appendix B) at the EOT assessment: PET-CT Score 4 or 5 with reduced uptake compared with baseline and residual mass(es).
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days
EOT OMR rate defined as the proportion of participants achieving CR or partial response (PR) per PET/CT Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol appendix B) at the EOT assessment.
Time frame: 2 years
2-year DOR is a probability estimated using the Kaplan Meier method; DOR is defined as the time measurement criteria are met for CR or PR (whichever is first recorded) per Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol Appendix B) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented, or death due to any cause. CR and PR participants without events reported are censored at the last disease evaluation.
Time frame: 2 years
2-year DOCR is a probability estimated using the Kaplan Meier method; DOCR is defined as the time measurement criteria are met for CR per Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol Appendix B) until the first date that recurrent or progressive disease is objectively documented, or death due to any cause. CR participants without events reported are censored at the last disease evaluation.
Time frame: 2 years
2-year PFS is a probability estimated using the Kaplan Meier method; PFS is defined as the duration of time from study entry to documented disease progression (PD) or death. PD defined by Lugano 2014 criteria (protocol Appendix B).
Time frame: 2 years
2-y TTNT is a probability estimated using the Kaplan Meier method; TTNT is defined as the duration of time from the first dose of treatment until the time of initiation of new therapy, or censored at the date of last contact.
Time frame: 2 years
2-year OS is a probability estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method; OS is defined as the time from study entry to death, or censored at date last known alive.
Time frame: up to 10 years
Histological transformation was defined as participants who have a biopsy showing diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). Incidence is the number of participants with histological transformation during or after treatment.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade CRS AEs regardless of attribution based on American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy [ASTCT] Consensus grading as reported on case report forms are counted and maximum grade tabulated. Incidence by grade is then tabulated as the number of participants ever experiencing maximum grade during the time of observation.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade 3-5 CRS AEs with attribution of probably, possibly or definitely-related to treatment based on American Society of Transplantation and Cellular Therapy [ASTCT] Consensus grading as reported on case report forms were counted. Rate is the proportion of treated participants experiencing at least one treatment-related grade 3-5 CRS AE of any type during the time of observation.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade neurotoxicity AEs regardless of attribution based on CTCAEv5 as reported on case report forms are counted and maximum grade tabulated. Incidence by grade is then tabulated as the number of participants ever experiencing maximum grade during the time of observation.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade 3-5 neurotoxicity AEs with attribution of probably, possibly or definitely-related to treatment based on CTCAEv5 as reported on case report forms were counted. Rate is the proportion of treated participants experiencing at least one treatment-related grade 3-5 neurotoxicity AE of any type during the time of observation.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade 3-5 AEs regardless of attribution based on CTCAEv5 as reported on case report forms were counted. Rate is the proportion of treated participants experiencing at least one grade 3-5 AE of any type during the time of observation.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade 3-5 AEs with attribution of probably, possibly or definitely-related to treatment based on CTCAEv5 as reported on case report forms were counted. Rate is the proportion of treated participants experiencing at least one treatment-related grade 3-5 AE of any type during the time of observation.
Time frame: (Cycle 1 = 36 days, cycle 2-9 = 28 days), up to 267 days + 30 days
All grade 2-5 AEs with attribution of probably, possibly or definitely-related to treatment based on CTCAEv5 as reported on case report forms were counted. Rate is the proportion of treated participants experiencing at least one treatment-related grade 2-5 AE of any type during the time of observation.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Heather A Walker, MPH
CONTACT
Reid Merryman, MD
CONTACT
Reid Merryman, MD
Other
A Phase 2 Study of Epcoritamab and Rituximab for First-line Treatment of Follicular Lymphoma
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07634471
Follicular Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03190928
Follicular Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05006716
B-cell Malignancy, Blood Protein Disorders
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07226843
Follicular Lymphoma, Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases
Scottsdale, Arizona, United States
View Trial Details