Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01143727

Enzymatic Versus (vs) Autolytic Debridement of Diabetic Foot Ulcers

This study compares two standard methods for cleaning the surface of wounds on the feet of patients with diabetes mellitus. The question being asked is whether inflammation of the wound affects the ability of one or both of the methods to work.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

Richard C. Galperin, DPM

Dallas, Texas, 75224, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • The informed consent document must be read, signed, and dated by the subject or the subject's legally authorized representative before conducting any study procedures or exams. In addition, the informed consent document must be signed and dated by the individual who consents the subject before conducting the screening visit. A photocopy of the signed informed consent document must be provided to the subject, and the original signed document placed in the subject's chart.
  • Of either sex, aged 18 years or older.
  • A diagnosis of Diabetes Mellitus, Type I or II, requiring medication to control blood glucose levels.
  • A qualifying ulcer, defined as follows:
  • Ulcer grade 1 or 2 on the Wagner Classification Scale (refer to Section 9.4.1)
  • Infection / inflammation grade 1 or 2 for wound bed inflammation (refer to Section 9.4.2)
  • Has not been treated or has not responded to treatment during the past 30 days
  • Has an apparent area ≥ 3.0 cm²
  • Requires debridement of the wound bed
  • Is sufficiently moist to allow collection of wound fluid using a filter paper disc
  • Adequate arterial blood flow evidenced by ankle brachial index (ABI) of ≥ 0.7 and ≤ 1.1; if the ABI is greater than 1.1, then toe pressure of >50 mmHg.
  • Subject must be willing to use the Darco shoe off-loading device and insole, or a comparable device, as indicated.
  • Subject able to follow instructions, particularly regarding the application of test articles and dressings at home. Able to apply the test articles, or has a caregiver available to apply the test articles according to the protocol.

Exclusion criteria

  • Contraindications or known hypersensitivity to the test articles or their components.
  • Cellulitis extending >2 cm around the target ulcer, lymphangitic streaking, spread beneath the superficial fascia, deep-tissue abscess, gangrene, or infection of muscle, tendon, joint or bone.
  • Target ulcer tunneling per probing and visual assessment.
  • Use of systemic antibiotics or any drug listed in Section 9.1.6 of this protocol within 10 days of SCR visit.
  • Concomitant illness or condition which, in the opinion of the Principal - Investigator, places the subject at risk for this study.
  • The Medical Monitor may declare any subject ineligible for a valid procedural or medical reason.

Treatment and study plan

Santyl

Drug

Apply one 24-hr period sufficient to cover the wound.

Tegaderm Hydrogel

Drug

Apply once 24-hr period sufficient to cover the wound.

Primary outcomes

  1. Wound Appearance

    Time frame: 28 days

    Weekly wound appearance as assessed by BWAT-m scores. BWAT-m scores used to determine primary efficacy consist of 8 subscales, each grade an aspect of wound status on a 1-5 scale; 1=normal intact skin; 5=least desirable. Total score=8-40. Subscales: Edges, Undermining, Necrotic Tissue Type, Necrotic Tissue Amount, Exudate Type, Exudate Amount, Skin Color Surrounding Wound, and Granulation Tissue.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Percent Change in Wound Area

    Time frame: 28 days

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Healthpoint

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of SANTYL vs. Hydrogel in Debridement of Inflamed Diabetic Foot Ulcers

Important dates

Study start
2010
Primary completion
2011
Study completion
2012
First posted
Jun 14, 2010
Registry last updated
May 31, 2013

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.