Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT05520138

Enzalutamide vs. Abiraterone in Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC)

This study will be a retrospective data analysis to compare outcomes between patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who initiated enzalutamide and those who initiated abiraterone using the 100% Fee-For-Service Medicare claims data. The study will address the following objectives:

Primary objective: To compare overall survival (OS) in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC who initiated enzalutamide vs. abiraterone

Secondary objectives:

* To compare OS in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC who received only enzalutamide without any subsequent therapy vs. abiraterone without any subsequent therapy * To compare treatment duration and time to subsequent therapy in chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC patients initiating enzalutamide vs. abiraterone

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

Male

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Pfizer Inc

New York, 10017, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Male with ≥ 1 diagnosis claim for prostate cancer
  • Have documented secondary metastasis code on or after the initial prostate cancer diagnosis
  • Have initiated enzalutamide or abiraterone within 90 days prior to the metastasis date or on or after the metastasis date. The initiation date of enzalutamide or abiraterone will be defined as the index date.
  • Have evidence of surgical or medical castration before the index date
  • At least 18 years old at the index date
  • Continuous eligibility for ≥ 12 months prior to the index date

Exclusion criteria

  • Received chemotherapy, novel hormonal therapy, radium-223, or immunotherapy prior to the index date
  • Had a prior history of other cancers

Treatment and study plan

Enzalutamide

Drug

As provided in real-world setting

Other names: Xtandi

Abiraterone Acetate

Drug

As provided in real-world setting

Other names: Yonsa, Zytiga

Primary outcomes

  1. Overall Survival (OS): Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting (IPTW)

    Time frame: From index date to date of death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (from 10-Sep-2014 to 31-Dec-2020, approximately 76 months); retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion (approximately 10 months)

    OS (time to death) was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the date of death. Participants who did not die were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earlier of disenrollment from Medicare or end of data availability. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

Secondary outcomes

  1. OS Among Participants Without Any Subsequent Therapy: IPTW

    Time frame: From index date to date of death or censoring date, whichever occurred first (from 10-Sep-2014 to 31-Dec-2020, approximately 76 months); retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion (approximately 10 months)

    OS (time to death) was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the date of death. Participants who did not die were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earlier of disenrollment from Medicare or end of data availability. Kaplan-Meier method was used for analysis.

  2. Treatment Duration: IPTW

    Time frame: From index date to date of discontinuation event or censoring date, whichever occurred first(from 10-Sep-2014 to 31-Dec-2020, approximately 76months); retrospective data extracted and evaluated from start date and until completion(approximately 10months)

    Treatment duration of the index treatment was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the discontinuation date. Discontinuation was defined as the earliest of 1) death, 2) last observed administration plus day of supply associated with last administration, or 3) day before the start of next line of therapy. Death, a gap of 90 days or more after the last observed prescription date + day of supply, and initiation of next line of therapy was considered as discontinuation events. Participants who did not discontinue were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earlier of disenrollment from Medicare or end of data availability.

  3. Time to Subsequent Therapy: IPTW

    Time frame: From index date to start of next line of therapy (from 10-Sep-2014 to 31-Dec-2020, approximately 76 months); retrospective data extracted and evaluated from study start date and until study completion (approximately 10 months)

    Time to subsequent therapy was defined as the time from the initiation of enzalutamide or abiraterone (i.e., index date) to the start of next line of therapy. Participants who did not start a new line of therapy were censored at their last available follow-up, which was defined as the earliest of 1) death, 2) disenrollment from Medicare, and 3) end of data availability.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pfizer

Industry

Registry information

Official study title

A Real-World Comparison of Clinical Outcomes in Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients Who Initiated Enzalutamide vs. Abiraterone Acetate (Abiraterone) in the 100% Medicare Fee-For-Service (FFS) Data (2009-2020)

Important dates

Study start
2022
Primary completion
2023
Study completion
2023
First posted
Aug 29, 2022
Registry last updated
Sep 27, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.