NCT Number: NCT00077818
Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Subjects Who Present to the Emergency Department With Acute Coronary Syndrome (RESCUE)
The purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of enoxaparin compared to unfractionated heparin (UFH) for patients diagnosed with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) in the emergency department (ED). Efficacy is assessed by using a composite score consisting of 30-day all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and recurrent angina requiring revascularization.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeKey information
Conditions
Age range
18 year and older
Sex eligibility
All sexes
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Who can participate
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
- Rest angina lasting at least 10 minutes that is highly suggestive of myocardial ischemia and is not explained by trauma or obvious abnormalities on chest x-ray, occurring within 24 hours of randomization;
- TIMI risk score greater than or equal to 4 (a qualitative test for CK-MB or Troponin may be utilized for screening purposes; however, a quantitative test must still be performed.)
Exclusion criteria
- Increased bleeding risk as defined by any of the following:
- Ischemic stroke within the last year
- Any previous hemorrhagic stroke, intracranial tumor, or intracranial aneurysm
- Recent (<1 month) trauma or major surgery (including bypass surgery)
- Active bleeding (other than minor skin abrasions)
- Impaired hemostasis including any one of the following:
- Known International Normalized Ratio (INR) >1.5
- Past or present bleeding disorder (including congenital bleeding disorders such as von Willebrand's disease or hemophilia, acquired bleeding disorders, and unexplained clinically significant bleeding disorders)
- Known or history of thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100,000/mL)
- History of thrombocytopenia with glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy, heparin, or enoxaparin
- Angina from a secondary cause such as:
- severe, uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure >180 mm Hg despite treatment)
- anemia
- valvular disease
- congenital heart disease
- hypertrophic cardiomyopathy
- restrictive or constrictive cardiomyopathy
- thyrotoxicosis.
- Bundle branch block not known to be old in the context of angina.
- Undergone a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) within the past 24 hours.
- A known allergy to heparin, low molecular weight heparin, pork or pork products.
- Any contraindications to treatment with UFH or LMWH.
- A recent (<48 hours) or planned spinal/epidural anesthesia or puncture.
- Thrombolytic therapy within the preceding 24 hours.
- Any other clinically relevant serious diseases, including severe liver disease or renal failure [creatinine clearance <30 mL/min], rendering implementation of the protocol or interpretation of the study results difficult.
- Treatment with other investigational agents or devices within the previous 30 days, planned use of investigational drugs or devices, or has previously enrolled in this trial.
- Inability to comply with the protocol (e.g., has uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits).
- Inability to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study or is otherwise unable to provide informed consent.
- A prosthetic heart valve
Treatment and study plan
Primary outcomes
-
To assess a composite score that considers the occurrence of all-cause mortality, non-fatal MI, or recurrent angina requiring the need for revascularization
Time frame: up to 30 days (± 2 days) following randomization
Secondary outcomes
-
Incidence of major hemorrhage
Time frame: during the index hospitalization
-
Incidence of minor hemorrhage
Time frame: during the index hospitalization
-
Combined incidence of 30-day all-cause mortality and nonfatal MI
Time frame: at 30 days
-
The incidence of 30-day all-cause mortality by itself
Time frame: At 30 days
-
Total health care utilization
Time frame: from baseline (initial hospitalization) through the Day 30 follow-up visit.
Sponsors and collaborators
Lead sponsor
Sanofi
Industry
Registry information
Official study title
A Prospective, Open-label, Randomized, Parallel-group Investigation to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Enoxaparin Versus Unfractionated Heparin in Subjects Who Present to the Emergency Department With Acute Coronary Syndrome
Important dates
- Study start
- 2002
- Primary completion
- 2005
- First posted
- Feb 16, 2004
- Registry last updated
- Oct 15, 2009
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Related clinical trials
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
MERITnI - Mindray-hs-cTnI Assay: Analytical and Clinical Evaluation for the Diagnosis and RIsk AssessmenT of Myocardial InfarctIon.
NCT05853042
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsAuricular Vagus Stimulation and STEMI
NCT05992259
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Krasnodar, Russia
View Trial DetailsHealthy Heart Habits-2
NCT06440278
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsSwitching From Ticagrelor to Prasugrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome
NCT05183178
Acute Coronary Syndrome, Cardiovascular Diseases
Lund, Sweden
View Trial Details