Telemonitoring + self-management support
BehavioralWeekly automated assessment calls with follow-up by a care manager and a CarePartner for 12 months. Baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow-up
NCT Number: NCT01684709
This study compares the medical and psychological effects of telemonitoring plus intensified self-management support to those of usual care alone for patients with poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM). If this intervention proves effective without increasing costs or clinician burden, then its implementation could yield major public health benefits, especially for vulnerable and underserved DM patients, and broader societal benefit may occur through increased helping behavior and strengthened social ties.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me21 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
Although in-home caregivers (ICGs) help improve diabetes mellitus (DM) outcomes, they may lack the resources needed to do this optimally, and are at risk for psychosocial decline and caregiver burnout. Complicating matters, millions of chronically-ill older Americans live alone and receive long-distance caregiving without any supporting structure or resources to ensure its effectiveness. In this study, diabetes patients with poor glycemic will be recruited from two clinical sites, and half will have an ICG. Patients will nominate a "CarePartner" (CP; adult relatives or friends from outside their home) to receive weekly email reports about their DM health and behavioral needs, and will be given resources to help them to provide self-management support. Patients will then be randomized to receive either one year of CP intervention or usual medical care. In the CP intervention arm, patients will provide weekly updates on their DM health and self-management through weekly automated telemonitoring. Summaries of this will be emailed to their CP along with guidance on helping the patient address reported problem(s), and their clinicians will be alerted about medically-urgent problems. We will assess the following outcomes in both arms before intervention and also after 6 and 12 months of intervention: glycemic control, DM-related distress, DM self-management, health-related quality of life, systolic blood pressure, caregiver burden, relationship quality, and cost of DM care.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Weekly automated assessment calls with follow-up by a care manager and a CarePartner for 12 months. Baseline, 6 month, and 12 month follow-up
Time frame: 12 months
H1 (Primary biological outcome): Compared to DM patients randomized to control, those randomized to intervention will have a 0.3% greater improvement in HbA1c units.
Time frame: 12 months
Compared to controls, intervention patients will have lower diabetes related distress.
University of Michigan
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03899883
Diabetes, Diabetes Complications
Aurora, Colorado, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05313529
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05684341
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Changhua, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07255820
Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities, Diabetes Mellitus
Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
View Trial Details