University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
NCT Number: NCT04647032
The overall goal of this project is to improve cognitive control abilities in adults with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) through a form of non-invasive brain stimulation, transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me60 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
San Francisco, California, 94158, United States
30 older adults aged 60-80 years with md-aMCI were randomized to 8 sessions of transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) with simultaneous cognitive control training (CCT). The intervention took place within the participant's home without direct researcher assistance. Half of the participants received prefrontal theta tACS during CCT and the other half received control tACS. Outcomes were assessed pre and post intervention.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) will be applied across the prefrontal cortex near electrodes coordinates AF3/AF4
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Divided attention was assessed as the difficulty level achieved during perceptual discrimination performance while participants were engaged in the Akili AKL-T01 task. Higher is better.
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Divided attention was assessed as the difficulty level achieved during perceptual discrimination performance while participants were engaged in the Akili AKL-T01 task. Higher is better.
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Sustained attention was assessed via response times to visual targets during the continuous performance task. Lower is better.
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Sustained attention was assessed via response times to visual targets during the continuous performance task. Lower is better.
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Working memory was assessed as the average maximum number correct from the ACE-X span tasks - memory for order of illuminated squares.
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Working memory was assessed as the average maximum number correct from the ACE-X span tasks - memory for order of illuminated squares
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-day follow-up), approximately 1 week after baseline
Scores on the IADL will be assessed pre and post intervention. Higher scores are better (minimum = 0, maximum = 4).
Time frame: Post-tACS (1-month follow-up), approximately 1 month after baseline
Scores on the IADL will be assessed pre and post intervention. Higher scores are better (minimum = 0, maximum = 4).
University of California, San Francisco
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06347172
Alzheimer Disease, Brain Diseases
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04070703
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Eugene, Oregon, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07554144
Adolescent Development, Attention Impaired
Kütahya, Centre, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07729865
Cognition Disorders, Cognitive Dysfunction
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details