Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT00853866

Enhancement of Motor Function with Reboxetine and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

The hypothesis of the study is that combination of reboxetine/tDCS is more effective in enhancing motor functions of daily life (assessed by the Jebsen Taylor test) as compared to reboxetine and tDCS alone. The protocol is designed as a within-subject, block randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–86 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 4

Primary location

University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Department of Neurology

Hamburg, Free and Hanseatic City of Hamburg, 20246, Germany

About this study

One important feature of the human brain is the ability to undergo plastic changes and reorganization after learning and lesions of the nervous system. This ability is of major importance for the treatment of functional deficits after stroke. Stroke is the major disease leading to persistent functional disabilities in Germany. However, the success rate of therapeutic interventions, especially in chronic stroke patients, is still unsatisfactory. Thus, basic science is essential to discover new therapeutic options that bear the potential for translation into clinical practice. Recent evidence is pointing to modulating the motor cortical excitability in order to enhance motor function in stroke patients. For this purpose, reboxetine as a selective reuptake inhibitor of noradrenaline and transcranial direct current stimulation have proven effective in enhancing motor functions needed for daily life activities by 10-12%. These improvements were significant compared to placebo, but still clinically unsatisfactory. Thus, this protocol aims at enhancing the excitability modulatory effect of each single intervention through the combination of reboxetine and tDCS. The hypothesis of the study is that combination of reboxetine/tDCS is more effective in enhancing motor functions of daily life (assessed by the Jebsen Taylor test) as compared to reboxetine and tDCS alone.

The protocol is designed as a within-subject, block randomized placebo-controlled double-blind crossover study. 12 chronic stroke patients with persistent functional deficits of the arm and/or hand will be included. The primary outcome measure is the time needed to fulfill all subtests of the Jebsen Taylor test. All patients undergo four different conditions in four different sessions: 1) reboxetine + verum tDCS; 2) reboxetine + sham tDCS 3) placebo drug + verum tDCS 4) placebo drug + sham tDCS.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • age between 18 and 86
  • patient is contractually capable
  • first-ever, ischemic stroke
  • minimum time since stroke 9 months
  • a paresis of the arm/hand muscles above 3 on the MRC scale

Exclusion criteria

  • multiple cerebral lesions and associated residual deficits
  • severe head trauma in the past
  • seizures
  • ferromagnetic implants in the head/neck region
  • pacemaker
  • a psychiatric disorder or neurological disease besides stroke
  • intake of illegal drugs
  • severe aphasia or cognitive deficits that impede contractual capability
  • contraindications for reboxetine (seizures, glaucoma, prostate hyperplasia with urinary retention, cardiac arrhythmias, potential interactions with co-medication)
  • pregnancy
  • breast-feeding patients

Treatment and study plan

reboxetine

Drug

single dose of 4mg reboxetine 80 minutes before assessment of Jebsen Taylor test

Other names: brand name: Edronax, serial number: KPR 08092410/11

Placebo

Drug

placebo, 80 min before assessment of Jebsen Taylor test

Other names: placebo drug resembling Edronax

tDCS verum

Device

20 minutes of 1 mV transcranial direct current stimulation with 5x5 cm electrodes with active electrode over the primary motor representation of the stroke hemisphere and reference electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area Application during assessment of Jebsen Taylor test

Other names: Hersteller:, DC Stimulator, Manufacturer:, eldith -Electro-Diagnostic & Therapeutic Systems GmbH, Gustav-Kirchhoff-Straße 5, D-98693 Ilmenau, Serialnumber: 0006

tDCS sham

Device

30 seconds of 1 mV transcranial direct current stimulation with 5x5 cm electrodes with active electrode over the primary motor representation of the stroke hemisphere and reference electrode over the contralateral supraorbital area Application during assessment of Jebsen Taylor test

Other names: Hersteller:, DC Stimulator, Manufacturer:, eldith -Electro-Diagnostic & Therapeutic Systems GmbH, Gustav-Kirchhoff-Straße 5, D-98693 Ilmenau, Serialnumber: 0006

Primary outcomes

  1. JTT

    Time frame: crossover design, four different sessions with four different interventions

    Jebsen Taylor test

Secondary outcomes

  1. Force

    Time frame: crossover design, four different sessions with four different interventions

    maximum grip force

  2. NHPT

    Time frame: crossover design, four different sessions with four different interventions

    nine hole peg test

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

Other

Collaborators

  • German Research Foundation
  • University Hospital Tuebingen

Registry information

Official study title

Entwicklung Neuronaler Repräsentationen Nach Schlaganfall: Verbesserung Motorischer Leistungen Durch Transkranielle Gleichstromstimulation Und Noradrenerge Co-Stimulation

Acronym: STIMBOX

Important dates

Study start
2009
Primary completion
2009
Study completion
2010
First posted
Mar 2, 2009
Registry last updated
Dec 10, 2024

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.