CHU Liége
Liège, Belgium
NCT Number: NCT03620851
Comparison of the efficiency of enhanced recovery program after colorectal surgery in elderly patients (≥ 70 yo) and younger patients (< 70 yo). Efficiency will be rated as a function of length of hospital stay, postoperative complications (medical and surgical, as well as adherence to protocol.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Observational
Liège, Belgium
In 1995 Henrik Kehlet described the concept of fast track surgery after colectomy. It consisted of a multimodal and multidisciplinary approach that aimed at controlling the surgical stress response and at mitigating its consequences. Subsequently postoperative recovery is improved and accelerated, which allows a median hospital stay of 2-days after laparoscopic colectomy. The concept of fast track surgery progressively evolved into enhanced recovery programme (ERP). The acceleration of postoperative recovery and the reduction in the duration of hospitalisation are not associated with an increased incidence of surgical complications nor a greater rate of unplanned hospital readmission, but rather result in less medical complications. The economic benefits are obvious.
The elderly present specific physical, metabolic and socio-environmental characteristics that should be considered in case of surgery. Age has been shown to be an independent prognostic factor for postoperative morbidity after colorectal surgery, but this was reported before the development of ERP. Indeed implementation of ERP significantly reduces the rate of postoperative complications, even in the elderly. Increased risk of postoperative morbidity in elderly as compared to younger patients is nevertheless commonly admitted. Moreover adherence of elderly with the items of ERP is usually considered inferior than that of younger patients. Adaptation of ERP to the specificities of elderly is sometimes advocated. All these explain the reluctance of many practitioners to propose ERP in older patients. However recent meta-analyses suggest that implementation of ERP is feasible and efficient in these patients. The retrospective analysis of our first 100 patients introduced in our audit database revealed even similar length of hospital stay for elderly and younger patients.
The investigators therefore compared the length of hospital stay in the elderly and the younger patients and tested the hypothesis of non-inferiority for elderly patients as compared to younger patients. This is a retrospective analysis of 270 consecutive patients scheduled for colorectal surgery, all managed with the same ERP protocol, and prospectively introduced in our audit database.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
effect of age on the efficiency of enhanced recovery program
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
The duration of hospitalization is defined as the numberof days the patient stays in the hospital between the day of his surgery and the day of his discharge from the hospital
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
The incidence of postoperative complications (medical and surgical) occurring during the hospital stay and up-to 30-day after surgery will be recorded from our audit database. The following medical complications will be recorded: cardiac, pulmonary, neurological, and uro-nephrologic complications. For surgical complications, we will record postoperative ileus, parietal complications, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal sepsis and hemorrhage, unplanned surgery.
Time frame: through study completion, an average of 1 month
compliance to the different items of the program
University of Liege
Other
Effect of Age on the Efficiency of Enhanced Recovery Program After Colorectal Surgery
Acronym: ERPOLD
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03423485
Colorectal Surgery
Paris, Clichy, France
View Trial DetailsNCT06168669
Anastomotic Leak, Colorectal Surgery
Orlando, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05934981
Benign or Malignant Rectal or Colon Tumors, Colonic Diseases
Bordeaux, France
View Trial DetailsNCT07601594
Colorectal Surgery, Ileostomy
Lahore, Punjab Province, Pakistan
View Trial Details