EPAC
BehavioralEach patient will receive a lay health worker who will engage and educate patients on goals of care documentation and will continue to address goals of care for at least 6 months with patients after enrollment in the study.
NCT Number: NCT02966509
The Engagement of Patients with Advanced Cancer is an intervention that utilizes well-trained lay health coaches to engage patients and their families in goals of care and shared decision-making after a diagnosis of advanced cancer. Although lay health workers have never been tested in this role, we hypothesize that lay health workers can feasibly improve goals of care documentation and help to reduce unwanted healthcare utilization at the end of life for Veterans diagnosed with new advanced stages of cancer and those diagnosed with recurrent disease.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
VAPAHCS proposes to implement and evaluate several critical elements to be in alignment with the VHA's Strategic Goal and priority areas for FY2013. The Engagement of Patients with Advanced Cancer project is an innovative program that will strengthen provider-patient relationship and facilitate whole person care about matters important to Veterans with cancer and important to support network and family. The project is intended to help establish Goals of Care Plan with appropriate documentation, develop, deploy, and evaluate a model of care for persons with cancer that is intended to improve clinical outcomes and experience of care for individuals with advanced cancer who have advanced cancer (stages III, IV or recurrent disease). The intervention provides patients with lay health coaches who assist patients and their families in discussing goals of care and engage in shared-decision making. The goal of the project is to demonstrate that there is improved patient experiences, outcomes, and that the program helps to reduce utilization of health care resources at the end of life.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Each patient will receive a lay health worker who will engage and educate patients on goals of care documentation and will continue to address goals of care for at least 6 months with patients after enrollment in the study.
Time frame: 6 months after each patient enrollment
Feasibility is defined as at least 75% of patients in the intervention arm with a documented Goals of Care titled medical note within 6 months of patient enrollment in the study.
Time frame: 6 months after patient enrollment
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 15 months after patient enrollment
Emergency Department Use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 15 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 6 months after patient enrollment
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 15 months after patient enrollment
Hospitalization use for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 15 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 6 months after patient enrollment
Hospice referral for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 6 months after patient enrollment
Palliative Care Referral for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 6 months after enrollment.
Time frame: 15 months after patient enrollment
Palliative Care Referral for each patient will be abstracted by electronic medical record chart review for each patient at 15 months after enrollment.
Time frame: Change in Patient Satisfaction with Care from baseline to 6 months.
Each patient will receive a satisfaction with care survey (The Consumer Assessment of Health Care Providers and Systems - General (CAHPS)) at baseline and 6 months. We will measure the change in satisfaction from baseline to 6 months. Scores for satisfaction were assessed using the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems-General survey question #18 which measured rating of health provider, on which scores range from 0 to 10, with higher ratings correspond to higher patient satisfaction. Scores for each group are averaged at baseline and at 6 months.
Time frame: 6 months
Each patient will receive a validated satisfaction with decision-making survey (The Satisfaction with Decision Survey) at 6 months after study enrollment.Satisfaction with Decision was assessed with the use of the 6-question Satisfaction with Decision Scale, on which scores range from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating better satisfaction with decision-making. Scores for each group are averaged at 6 months after study enrollment.
Stanford University
Other
Acronym: EPAC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05297734
Adenocarcinoma, Adnexal Diseases
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07428278
Advanced Cancer, Death
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07147023
Advanced Cancer, Cancer
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06245525
Agnosia, Behavior
Athens, Attica, Greece
View Trial Details