Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02681835

Endotracheal Intubation in Prehospital Scenario

We therefore designed this randomized crossover study to compare C-MAC with Macintosh laryngoscope in emergency intubation performed by paramedics according to three different intubator positions.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Medical University of Warsaw, Department of Emergency Medicine

Warsaw, Masovia, 02-005, Poland

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • give voluntary consent to participate in the study
  • maximum 1 year of work experience in medicine
  • minimum 50 clinical intubations
  • paramedics

Exclusion criteria

  • not meet the above criteria
  • wrist or low back diseases

Treatment and study plan

C-MAC laryngoscope

Device

Intubation performed using C-MAC laryngoscope

Other names: C-MAC

Macintosh laryngoscope

Device

Intubation performed using laryngoscope with Macintosh blade

Other names: C-MAC

Primary outcomes

  1. Time required for successful intubation

    Time frame: 1 day

Secondary outcomes

  1. success rate of intubation attempt

    Time frame: 1 day

    success rate of first, second and third intubation attempt

  2. cumulative success ratios related to time

    Time frame: 1 day

    cumulative success ratio was counted as percentage of successful intubations in time intervals in all scenarios

  3. Ease of intubation

    Time frame: 1 day

    To access subjective opinion about the difficulty of each intubation method, participants were asked to rate it on a visual analog scale (VAS) with a score from 1 (extremely easy) to 10 (extremely difficult).

  4. Cormack&Lehane grade

    Time frame: 1 day

    glottic view during intubation rate using Cormack&Lehane grade

  5. Dental Compression

    Time frame: 1 day

    the severity of the potential dental trauma was calculated based on previously described modified grading scale (Svoldelli, 2009)

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Medical University of Warsaw

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Comparison of the C-MAC and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Tracheal Intubation in Different Intubator Positions. A Randomized, Crossover, Manikin Trial

Important dates

Study start
2016
Primary completion
2016
Study completion
2016
First posted
Feb 12, 2016
Registry last updated
Mar 9, 2016

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.