Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03532347

Endoscopic Ultrasound Guided Tissue Sampling (The SharkBITE Study)

This study compares the diagnostic performance of Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration and EUS guided core biopsy (SharkCore) in patients with a solid pancreatic mass.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

The Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust

Newcastle, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE7 7DN, United Kingdom

About this study

Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) guided fine needle aspiration (FNA) and fine needle biopsy (FNB) are the standard methods for obtaining tissue samples from tumours of the pancreas. The diagnostic accuracy by strict criteria is around 75-80%. A non diagnostic sample causes delay and the need for a repeat procedure. To date no significant difference has been found between standard FNA and standard FNB needles. A novel opposing bevel design (SharkCore) needle for FNB may provide better diagnostic performance. The aim of this study is to compare the performance of a standard needle and the Sharkcore needle. Patients attending for routine biopsy of a suspected pancreatic tumour will be invited to participate. All participants will have 3 samples taken with each needle. The samples from each needle will be processed and reported separately with the pathologists blinded as to the report from the other needle. Following the procedure participants will be observed as normal in the recovery area and allowed home later. Further study participation is limited to 1 telephone call at 7 days. Participants will be asked if they have developed any new symptoms since the procedure and whether they have had to seek medical attention for this.The risks of the study procedure are the same as those of a non study procedure. Both needle types are in routine use in our unit. The study will be performed in the endoscopy unit of the Freeman hospital. The study is funded by a grant from Medtronic the company who make the Sharkcore needle. The study is planned to recruit 108 participants over 10 months with a further 6 months of follow up. If the new needle is found to perform better its routine use will potentially reduce the delay experienced by patients as well as the cost incurred by repeat procedures.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients 18 years and above with a solid pancreatic mass of any size, needing to Undergo the EUS examination to collect sample for diagnosis will be recruited for the study. The definition of a solid pancreatic mass will be based on an ultrasound or a CT scan result or based on the findings of a EUS examination done prior.
  • Patients should have the ability and be willing to give informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • Cysts that do not have a significant solid component will be excluded
  • Any contraindication to pancreatic biopsy.

Treatment and study plan

EUS-FNA needle (Beacon)

Device

Participants will be randomised to an initial 3 passes with Beacon FNA and then Beacon SharkCore biopsy needles or vice versa. 25g needles will be used for trans duodenal puncture and 22g for trans gastric puncture.

Other names: EUS-FNB needle (Beacon SharkCore)

Primary outcomes

  1. The sensitivity of standard Beacon FNA needle compared with the SharkCore (FNB) core biopsy needle in the sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

    Time frame: During EUS procedure

    The sensitivity of standard Beacon FNA needle compared with the SharkCore (FNB) core biopsy needle in the sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions during the EUS procedure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. To compare the adequacy of the sample obtained with standard Beacon FNA needle compared with the SharkCore core biopsy needle in the sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions.

    Time frame: During EUS Procedure

    To compare the adequacy of the sample obtained with standard Beacon FNA needle compared with the SharkCore core biopsy needle in the sampling of solid pancreatic mass lesions during EUS procedure per patient

  2. Duration of pathologist reporting time

    Time frame: Per sample anticipated to be 1-2 weeks

    During pathologist diagnostic routine reporting period per sample standard is usually 1-2 weeks

  3. Cost benefit analysis of the needle types

    Time frame: Over study period which is anticipated to be around 1 year

    An analysis to assess which needle is the most cost-effective

  4. Duration of sampling procedures

    Time frame: During the EUS procedure

    Duration of sampling procedures during EUS procedure per patient

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Newcastle-upon-Tyne Hospitals NHS Trust

Other

Collaborators

  • Medtronic

Registry information

Official study title

SharkCore Biopsy Needle Versus Standard FNA Needle in the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Masses a Randomised Controlled Cross-over Trial of EUS Guided Tissue Acquisition - The SharkBITE Study

Acronym: SharkBITE

Important dates

Study start
2017
Primary completion
2018
Study completion
2018
First posted
May 22, 2018
Registry last updated
Jun 10, 2019

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.