2nd Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, China
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China
NCT Number: NCT06464874
This study will retrospectively include LST patients who were admitted to 6 medical centers (The Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University; The Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine; First Affiliated Hospital of Huzhou University; The Second Hospital of Jiaxing; Jinhua People's Hospital; Lanxi People's Hospital) from 2020.05.01 to 2023.04.30 with the purpose of comparing the efficacy and safety of hybrid ESD and ESD in the treatment of colorectal LST. The complete resection rate, operation time, operation cost, intraoperative and postoperative complications of hybrid ESD and ESD LST will be compared. To provide strong evidence for the selection of endoscopic treatment strategies for LST.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310009, China
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Conventional ESD is the most suitable method for total resection, especially for large lesions. This method can complete the resection of early gastrointestinal cancer and precancerous lesions, while maintaining the integrity of digestive tract anatomy and physiological function.The operation difficulty of this technique is high, the equipment requirements are high, the operation time is long, and the complication rate is closely related to the technical level of the operator.
Hybrid ESD is a better choice, but only can remove the lesion in one piece, but also has a lower technical difficulty than conventional ESD
Time frame: 2 weeks
One-time complete excision
Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University
Other
Hybrid Versus Conventional Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Laterally Spreading Tumors (LSTs): A Retrospective Multicenter Study
Acronym: LST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.