Effect of Dexmedetomidine on Microsurgery Reconstruction in Cancer Patient
NCT06993740
Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT Number: NCT03776188
To determine patient outcomes (survival, additional endoscopic or surgical procedures) with an endoscopic suturing technique at predetermined intervals compared to historical controls when applicable.
To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and durability of trans-orifice endoscopic suturing therapy for revision of bariatric procedures as well as study the safety, efficacy, and durability of preventative fixation of GI endoprosthetics.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Observational
University of Arkansas, Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
To determine patient outcomes (survival, morbidity including hospitalization, additional re-interventions with radiologic, endoscopic or surgical procedures) with endoscopic suturing at predetermined intervals from the last endoscopic suturing procedure or at failure of the endoscopic suturing with conversion to another intervention such as surgery and compared to historical controls when applicable.
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of endoscopic suturing therapy in preventative fixation of stents and bariatric revision.
To collect data on the common use endoscopic suturing therapy in other indications.
This prospective clinical study is a real-world registry and not a randomized controlled trial. Given the conditions commonly treated with endoscopic suturing and the potential lack of equivalent expertise in open, laparoscopic, and trans-oral surgical procedures at all centers, randomization of participants is not possible nor ethical. In addition, there are clinical scenarios where endoscopic therapy with surgical sutures, tissue sealants, and/or endoprosthetics may be appropriate and open and laparoscopic surgical approaches inappropriate from an ethical viewpoint. Given the multitude of currently available minimally invasive approaches to repair, it would be unethical to expose and randomize patients who are suitable for more minimally invasive approaches to a more invasive and inherently more morbid approach.
This outcomes study is external to the subject receiving the medical device treatment. Subjects will receive the medical device treatment regardless of study participation and the surgery is not part of this research. Subjects will be consented prior to their procedure, to obtain basic follow-up information. If the subject provides informed consent to participate in the registry, then site staff will follow the participant's clinical data for the period of the registry. Site staff may also contact the subject(s) during their standard clinic visit or via the telephone and obtain information on: overall health, specific events related to any subsequent surgical, endoscopic, or radiologic interventions, and hospitalizations.
The clinical data will be collected during usual procedure follow-ups. This will include recording patient demographics, medications, testing results, comorbidities, body mass index, and reason for clinical care visit. If during the follow-up period, the subject undergoes additional clinically indicated procedures or hospitalizations for procedure related indications then the site will submit this information to the registry.
All procedures and device use will be performed as clinically indicated and as directed by the treating physician. All information requested as part of this registry will be obtained from clinical data obtained as part of study.
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Time frame: Change at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months
Change in the position measured using distance (centimeters).
Time frame: Change at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months
Change in the position measured using location. Location options: Bridging the GJ anastomosis, Confined to gastric lumen, Bridging the pylorus, Bridging Lower Esophageal Sphincter
Time frame: Change at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months
Distal from placement over time (yes or no)
Time frame: Change at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months
Stent replaced or re-structured over time (yes or no)
Time frame: Change at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months
Number of intact Sutures
Time frame: Change at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months
Days to removal and replacement
Time frame: Measured at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Changes in body weight measured in kilograms subsequent to the revisional procedure will be summarized using statistics both in percentage terms using the % excess weight lost and absolute terms.
Time frame: Measured at 2 weeks, 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months
Changes in body weight measured in kilograms subsequent to the revisional procedure will be summarized using statistics both in percentage terms using the % total weight loss and absolute terms.
American Gastroenterological Association
Other
Prospective Registry for Trans-Orifice Endoscopic Suturing Applications
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06993740
Anesthesia, Cardiovascular Diseases
Jakarta, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia
View Trial DetailsNCT05320718
Anesthesia, Local, Regional Anesthesia
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT05552092
Surgery
Gwangju, South Korea
View Trial DetailsNCT03369210
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases
Aachen, Germany
View Trial Details