Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT03679104

Endoscopic Clips Versus Overstich Suturing System Device for Closure of Mucosotomy After G-POEM

Gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) has been assessed as new modality for treatment of refractory gastroparesis. G-POEM is promising method, which is still under investigation as its safety and efficacy has not been established yet. The ideal closure technique in patients undergoing G-POEM needs to be established. Several techniques may be used for endoscopic mucosal closure: endoscopic clips, OTSC (over the scope clips), endo-loop based methods (KING closure) or endoscopic suture.

The aim of this prospective, open-label study is to compare efficacy and safety of two methods for incision closure in patients who undergo G-POEM: endoscopic clips vs. endoscopic suturing system (OverStitch).

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year–90 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Prague, 14021, Czechia

About this study

Based on principles of NOTES (natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery), a mini-invasive therapeutic procedure such as per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) or gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy (G-POEM) have been assessed as new modalities for treatment of oesophageal achalasia or refractory gastroparesis. G-POEM is a new and promising method, which is still under investigation as its safety and efficacy has not been established yet. There are several questions, which need to be answered before G-POEM is considered as a standard clinical procedure. These questions concern, among others, efficacy, safety, technical performance etc. Mucosal incision should be endoscopically closed to prevent leakage into the abdominal cavity. Obtaining adequate mucosal closure is one of the most important steps of the procedure and is essential in avoiding major morbidity. The ideal closure technique in patients undergoing G-POEM needs to be established. Several techniques may be used for endoscopic mucosal closure: endoscopic clips, OTSC clips, endo-loop based methods (KING closure) or endoscopic suture. At present, simple closure with endoscopic clips has been the most frequently described method for mucosal closure in patients undergoing G-POEM. However, as gastric mucosa is thicker compared to the esophagus, where clips are used for POEM without any major problems, several authors have described problems during gastric incision closure - it takes a rather longer time, some clips cannot be placed and in some patients, other closure method had to be used. Thus, endoscopic clips may not be an ideal closure method in the stomach. A platform that replicates a principle of surgical suturing is endoscopic suturing system.

The aim of this prospective, open-label study is to compare efficacy and safety of two methods for incision closure in patients who undergo G-POEM: endoscopic clips vs. endoscopic suturing system (OverStitch).

Investigators plan to randomize 30-40 patients (15-20 in both arms, ratio 1:1).

The assigned closure method will be decided by an endoscopist prior to starting closure.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Refractory (> 6 months) and severe (based on a validated total Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index) gastroparesis, with confirmed gastric emptying based on a gastric emptying study: standardized protocol of scintigraphy in all patients (performed less than 6 months prior to enrolment). The total GSCI (Gastroparesis Cardinal Symptom Index) score must be >2.0
  • Abnormal gastric emptying is defined as retention of Tc-99 m >60% at 2 h and/or ≥10% of residual activity at 4 h on a standardized sulphur colloid solid-phase gastric emptying study.
  • Abnormal gastric emptying breath test based on a solid normal range determination for the test used (e.g. T1/2 > 109 min)
  • Severe refractory disease is defined as GCSI >2.0 and failure or recurrence in patients who received available optimal pharmacological therapies.
  • Persons 18 years or older at the time of signing the informed consent
  • Signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria

  • No previous attempt with at least one prokinetic drug
  • No previous attempt to withdraw anticholinergic agents and glucagon like peptide -1 (GLP-1) and amylin analogues in patients treated with these substances
  • Active treatment with opioids or a history of treatment with opioids within 12 months before enrolment
  • Previous gastric surgery (Billroth I or Billroth II)
  • Known eosinophilic gastroenteritis
  • Organic pyloric (or intestinal) obstruction (fibrotic stricture, etc.)
  • Sever coagulopathy
  • Oesophageal or gastric varices and /or portal gastropathy
  • Advanced liver cirrhosis (Child B or Child C)
  • Active peptic ulcer disease
  • Pregnancy or puerperium
  • Malignant or pre-malignant gastric diseases (dysplasia, gastric cancer, GIST): patients with a history of such disease after its cure are eligible for enrolment
  • Any other condition, which in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with study requirements
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Diagnosis of rumination syndrome or "eating" disorder (mental anorexia, bulimia nervosa)
  • Inability to obtain informed consent

Treatment and study plan

Closure of mucosotomy using endoscopic clips

Procedure

Gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy procedure requires the incision in the mucosa and submucosa. The closure of this incision at the end of the procedure will be done using endoscopic clips. These are used in endoscopy to mechanically close two mucosal surfaces without the need for surgery and suturing. In this study, the following endoclips may be used: Resolution 360™ Clip (Boston Scientific), QuickClip Pro™(Olympus) or Instinct™ Endoscopic Hemoclip (Cook Medical).

Closure of mucosotomy using OverStitch™ suturing device

Procedure

Gastric per-oral endoscopic pyloromyotomy procedure requires the incision in the mucosa and submucosa. The closure of this incision at the end of the procedure will be done by OverStitch™ (Apollo Endosurgery Inc., Austin, Texas, USA), which is a suturing device that enables advanced endoscopic surgery by allowing physicians to place full-thickness sutures through a flexible endoscope.

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion of subjects with successful and safe incision closure.

    Time frame: 3 months

    Definition of successful closure: endoscopically completely closed incision, no need to use another "rescue" closure method, no leak on post-operative day 1, no leak related complications, no readmission due to closure dehiscence, no need for surgery due to closure.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Easiness of the closure

    Time frame: 3 months

    Handling with endoclips or OverStitch will be evaluated by means of a questionnaire where ease of use was scored on a VAS (visual analogue scale), 0 = impossible, 10 = very easy) by both, endoscopist as well as an endoscopy nurse assisting with the closure procedure.

  2. Closure time of mucosotomy

    Time frame: 1 day

    The duration of endoscopic closure, reported by the endoscopist performing the procedure

  3. Cost

    Time frame: 3 months

    To evaluate the economics and cost-effectiveness of treating gastroparesis

  4. Healing quality

    Time frame: 3 months

    Assessing gastric scar after gastric per-oral pyloromyotomy: based on a visual examination, the healing process could include three stages, namely stage A (active stage): means no tissue reparation features, stage H (healing stage): early morphological reparation features, and stage S (scar stage): completed repair process, that could by described as S1 (red) or S2 (white). Width and length of scar will be measures as well.

  5. Readmission within 30 days

    Time frame: 30 days

    A readmission for an endoscopic or surgery intervention to address a complication resulting from care during the initial admission.

  6. Mortality at 3 months

    Time frame: 3 months

    Incidence of fatal complications related to procedure

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Other Gov

Registry information

Official study title

Endoscopic Clips Versus Overstich Suturing System Device for Closure of Mucosotomy After Per-oral Endoscopic Pyloromyotomy (G-POEM)

Important dates

Study start
2018
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2021
First posted
Sep 20, 2018
Registry last updated
Jan 27, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.