Ain Shams University
Cairo, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Location contact
Ahmed A Abbas, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed A Eldein, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Asmaa F Hussein, Master
CONTACT
Tasnim R Naeem, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
NCT Number: NCT06546176
The aim of this study is to compare end to end anastomosis with omega suture versus end to anterior rectal wall in colorectal anastomosis as regard post operative anastomotic leakage, bowel function, operative time and intra operative blood loss.
Interested in participating?
Request Info18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Location status: Recruiting
Ahmed A Abbas, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Ahmed A Eldein, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Asmaa F Hussein, Master
CONTACT
Tasnim R Naeem, MD
SUB_INVESTIGATOR
Colorectal cancer has been reported to be the 3rd most common and the second most deadly cancer world wide.
Anterior resection is the gold standard operation for both rectal and recto-sigmoid cancer with considering oncological safety maintenance to be the most important goal which can be achieved by keeping abundant resection margin and ensuring anastomotic safety, despite the technical difficulties of working in a narrow deep pelvis.
Understanding the characteristics of each anastomotic technique and establishing a stable anastomotic procedure both are pillars in anastomotic leakage prevention.
The intersection of the linear staple line and circular staple line in conventional anastomotic way is considered a risk factor for anastomotic leakage by creating stapled corners (called "dog-ears") which considered potentially ischemic and represent the area with high incidence of anastomotic leakage. Single stapled technique using ether end to end with omega suture or end to side stapled anastomosis allows avoidance of the formation of this intersection.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
After the rectum was divided with a linear stapler, the circular stapler was placed allowing the anvil rod to penetrate the rectal stump near the linear stapler line. An omega suture including both ends of the linear stapler line was placed. The linear stapler line was approximated around the anvil rod of the circular stapler in an omega shape fashion as the omega suture was tied. This technique resulted in a complete resection of linear stapler line by the circular stapler.
A burse string suture was applied over the anvil of the circular stapler at the transection point of the descending colon using prolene 2/0.
The circular stapler introduced though the anus and its rod directed toward the anterior rectal wall and colorectal anastomosis was performed.
Time frame: 5 days after surgery
Anastomotic leakage will be measured for 5 days after surgery
Time frame: Until the procedure is completed
Operative time will be measured from the start of surgery till the end of surgery.
Time frame: 28 days postoperative
Hospital stay will be assessed from admission till discharge from hospital
Time frame: 7 days postoperative
Time of bowel function will be assessed
Time frame: 7 days postoperative
Wound complications will be recorded as bleeding and infection.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Ain Shams University
Other
Comparative Study Between End to End Anastomosis With Omega Suture Versus End to Anterior Rectal Wall In Colorectal Anastomosis in Sigmoid and Upper Rectal Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07056374
Anastomotic Leak, Colonic Diseases
Amsterdam, Netherlands
View Trial DetailsNCT04744792
Colonic Diseases, Colonic Neoplasms
View Trial DetailsNCT03390517
Anastomotic Leak, Colonic Diseases
Moscow, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT07351071
Anastomotic Complication, Anastomotic Leak
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
View Trial Details