Akdeniz University Faculty of Sport Sciences
Antalya, 07058, Turkey (Türkiye)
NCT Number: NCT07336745
Sport climbing often requires athletes to perform repeated climbing efforts with short rest periods. Over time, fatigue can build up in the muscles of the arms and forearms, which may reduce performance and increase the difficulty of continuing to climb at the same level.
This study aims to better understand different recovery methods that climbers may use between climbing efforts. Specifically, the study compares two recovery approaches: electrical muscle stimulation-based recovery and passive recovery (resting while seated).
In this study, adult male sport climbers will complete a structured climbing task designed to induce fatigue. After the climbing task, participants will receive one of the two recovery methods. On a separate study visit, they will complete the same procedure using the other recovery method. The order of the recovery methods will be randomized, and there will be a break of one week between sessions.
During the study sessions, researchers will record climbing-related performance measures, simple strength and endurance tasks, heart rate, and how hard the participants feel they are working. The information collected will help researchers better understand recovery strategies used in climbing and may inform training and recovery practices for athletes in the future.
Participation in the study is voluntary, and all procedures are conducted under controlled laboratory conditions.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Male
Interventional
Not applicable
Antalya, 07058, Turkey (Türkiye)
Sport climbing places high and repetitive demands on the forearm muscles, which are required to sustain repeated gripping and pulling actions with limited recovery time. During prolonged or repeated climbing bouts, local muscular fatigue can accumulate, potentially affecting endurance and movement quality. Competitive climbers are particularly exposed to these demands, as competitions often involve multiple rounds performed within the same day with short rest intervals. For this reason, recovery strategies that can be applied between climbing efforts are of practical relevance in both training and competition settings.
Electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is a recovery modality that delivers low-intensity electrical impulses to skeletal muscle, producing rhythmic, involuntary contractions. EMS has been used in various sport and rehabilitation contexts as a low-effort method that can be applied without additional mechanical load. However, its application as an inter-bout recovery strategy in sport climbing has not been sufficiently characterized under controlled, climbing-specific conditions.
This study is designed as a randomized crossover trial to compare EMS-based recovery (EMSr) and passive recovery (PASr) following a standardized climbing fatigue protocol. Advanced male sport climbers will participate in two experimental sessions separated by a one-week washout period. In each session, participants will complete the same climbing fatigue protocol, followed by one of the two recovery conditions, with the order of recovery methods randomized.
The fatigue protocol consists of repeated climbing bouts performed on a standardized training wall using a fixed route of defined difficulty. This protocol is intended to elicit localized forearm fatigue under reproducible conditions. Following completion of the fatigue protocol, participants will undergo either EMS applied to the forearm muscles for a fixed duration or passive recovery involving seated rest without additional intervention.
Climbing-related performance measures, muscular endurance tasks, cardiovascular responses, and ratings of perceived exertion will be recorded at predefined time points before and after the recovery period. These measurements are included to characterize physiological and performance-related responses associated with each recovery condition.
The crossover design allows each participant to serve as their own control, thereby reducing inter-individual variability and enabling a direct comparison of recovery approaches under standardized conditions.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
This intervention specifically targets the forearm flexor muscles (flexor carpi radialis, palmaris longus, flexor carpi ulnaris) using low-frequency electrical stimulation to promote local muscle recovery after climbing-induced fatigue. The protocol uses a 50-minute "Active Recovery" program (2-4-6-5-4-3-2-1 Hz) applied via a device, with intensity individually adjusted to elicit visible muscle contraction without discomfort. Unlike general active recovery or passive rest, this intervention provides localized neuromuscular stimulation designed to preserve climbing-specific performance metrics such as total move count and weighted isometric hang time.
Time frame: Immediately after the 50-minute recovery period following the fatigue protocol.
Total move count represents the number of hand movements completed by each participant during the TensionBoard Fatigue Test, which consists of 15 sets of 1-minute climbs with 1-minute rests on a standardized route (IRCRA grade 15). This measure assesses climbing-specific performance and endurance, reflecting the ability to sustain high-intensity climbing efforts after the fatigue protocol. Move count is recorded for each set, and the change from baseline (pre-recovery) to post-recovery is used to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention (EMS recovery vs. passive rest).
Akdeniz University
Other
Recovery Effects of Electrical Muscle Stimulation After Climbing-Induced Fatigue: A Randomized Crossover Trial
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07617857
Exercise-Induced Fatigue, Recovery
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07509970
Conditions or Focus of Study, Exercise-Induced Fatigue
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06893549
Exercise-Induced Fatigue, Fatigue Recovery
Taoyuan City, Taiwan
View Trial DetailsNCT07737327
Athletic Performance, Exercise-Induced Fatigue
View Trial Details