NCT Number: NCT05169359
Type 2 diabetes is a significant condition in VA affecting 20% of VA patients. Adherence to medication regimens and lifestyle factors is important to achieve care goals for these patients. Patients who use active participatory communication behaviors with their providers have better adherence to treatment and better biomedical outcomes, yet many patients are not prepared to engage in active communication with their providers. Existing coaching interventions have not been adopted in practice because of the cost of trained personnel. The investigators have shown the efficacy of a low-cost video that did not require trained personnel. This proposal proposes to test implementation strategies to deliver that video in VA primary care clinics and to test the effectiveness of the video to improve outcomes in a Hybrid Type 2 effectiveness-implementation trial using a cluster randomized stepped wedge design at eight sites. This proposal will test feasibility of implementing the video and if successful will generate the evidence to justify widespread dissemination of the video.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Jesse Brown VA Medical Center, Chicago, IL, Chicago, Illinois, United States
Background: Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D) affects almost one in five VA patients overall and almost one in four VA patients who are racial and ethnic minorities. Adherence to medication regimens and lifestyle factors (such as diet and exercise) is important to improve outcomes in T2D. Adherence to these factors and subsequent achievement of outcomes is related, at least in part, to effective communication in medical encounters. Empowering and activating patients to use more effective communication behaviors with their providers leads to better adherence to treatment and better biomedical outcomes. However, interventions to improve communication have not been adopted in practice largely due to the cost of trained personnel to deliver the training. Thus, there is a gap in effective interventions that can improve communication related outcomes. In a recent VA HSR&D funded trial the investigators showed efficacy of the Speak Up! video. Veterans watching the video had significantly higher self-efficacy to communicate and lower hemoglobin A1c at follow-up.
Significance: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is common, expensive, and chronic. Estimates put the prevalence of T2D at almost 20 percent. The proposed study is highly significant because the condition under study, T2D, is highly prevalent and has negative impacts for Veterans with the symptoms and sequelae of T2D. The objective to activate patients' communication to achieve goals of care and to improve outcomes of T2D is responsive to VA priorities to improve customer service, primary care practice, and care of complex chronic diseases.
Innovation: The proposal to engage patients in communication in medical visits is innovative because addressing patients' communication as contrasted with providers' communication is unique in the VA. It is also innovative because activating patients facilitates patient-centered care and shared decision making which are key goals in the VA/DOD guideline for the management of T2D and contributes to VA's commitment to the Whole Health model. Also, the intervention could be a paradigm for encouraging patients with other conditions to use active participatory communication. Specifically, the design and communication content of Speak Up! Could serve as a model for the development of activation interventions for Veterans with other conditions.
Specific Aims: The proposed Hybrid Type 2 study has two specific aims:
Aim 1. Implementation aim - In partnership with key clinical staff develop a strategy to deliver the Speak Up! video in VA outpatient primary care clinics using a facilitated Plan Do Study Act (PDSA) process.
Aim 2. Effectiveness aim - Examine the effectiveness of the Speak Up! video using the RE-AIM framework to evaluate Reach into the patient population, Effectiveness to improve outcomes (Hemoglobin A1c, communication self-efficacy, diabetes distress), Adoption by providers and clinics, Implementation (completion, fidelity, and intensity), and Maintenance after the end of external facilitation.
Hypothesis 1. Patients will have improvements in outcomes (A1c, diabetes distress, communication self-efficacy) from before to after watching the video.
Exploratory Hypothesis 2. Patients that are at higher risk of having challenges communicating with physicians (patients with low health literacy, African-American patients, patients with depression) will also have improvements in outcomes.
Methodology: The proposed study is a Hybrid Type 2 effectiveness - implementation trial of the intervention using a cluster-randomized stepped-wedge design in eight clinics. The investigators will test the implementation strategies using a formative evaluation guided by the Promoting Action on Research Implementation in Health Services (PARIHS) framework, and the investigators will use the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework: to examine effectiveness of the Speak Up! Video; to supplement the formative evaluation from PARIHS; and to conduct a summative evaluation to evaluate success of the implementation strategies.
Implementation/Next Steps: This proposal will test the feasibility of implementing the Speak Up! video in primary care and if successful will generate the evidence to justify widespread dissemination of the video.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Once a clinic begins active implementation (is ready to show the video) patients will view the Speak Up! Video intervention prior to their visit. The 10-minute video program will be provided to patients for viewing on an iPad (or a portable DVD player, computer or TV as appropriate to the site based on PDSA activities during implementation planning). The clinic staff will set patients up with comfortable headphones.
Time frame: Collected at baseline and 3 months post-visit
HgbA1c is regarded as the standard laboratory measurement (blood test) for assessing the control of diabetes over approximately three months preceding the test. HgbA1c is usually checked several times a year in patients with poorly controlled diabetes.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 1 week post-visit
Communication Self-Efficacy (pre and post visit) is the degree to which a patient feels able to interact with his/her provider in order to provide information about problems, obtain desired information about diagnosis, treatment and prognosis, and participate in formulating a plan. The Perceived Efficacy in Physician-Patient Interactions scale (PEPPI) is a valid and reliable measure of patients' perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians (alpha 0.83). The short form of the PEPPI (PEPPI-5) has 5-items. Score on the PEPPI-5 ranges from 5-25. Higher scores reflect a better perceived self-efficacy in interacting with physicians.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 1 week post-visit
Diabetes Distress is a 17-item scale that measures the emotional burden of diabetes on four subscales: emotional burden, physician-related distress, regimen-related distress, and diabetes-related interpersonal distress subscale. The Diabetes Distress scale is internally consistent and is well correlated with measures of depression, meal planning, exercise, and cholesterol levels. The scale ranges from 17 to 102. Higher scores indicate higher distress.
Time frame: Collected at baseline and 1 week post-visit
Trust in Provider is measured pre- and post visit using a 5-item measure. The scale is scored on a 7-point Likert scale using the anchors "strongly disagree" and "strongly agree". The scale ranges from 5 to 35. Higher scores reflect higher trust in provider.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 1 week post-visit
Patient Engagement is assessed with the Altarum Consumer Engagement (ACE) measure. We use 8-items from two subscales (commitment and navigation). The scale ranges from 8 to 40. Higher scores are associated with higher patient's engagement in their healthcare.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 1 week post-visit
This measure of medication adherence is the 9-item Brief Medication Questionnaire (BMQ), a highly sensitive scale for identifying non-adherence. The scale ranges from 9 to 45. Higher scores indicate more non-adherence.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 1 week post-visit
Self-Care will be measured with the Summary of Diabetes Self Care Activities (SDSCA) a well validated measure that assesses self-care activities (e.g., diet, physical activity, and smoking) The scale ranges from 12 to 96. Higher scores indicate better diabetes self-care.
Time frame: Collected 1 week post visit
Shared Decision Making (SDM) will be measured with the CollaboRATE. The scale ranges from 0 to 27. Higher scores indicate higher shared decision making. This measure assesses discussion of options, pros, cons and preferences of a health decision. Higher scores indicate greater shared decision making.
Time frame: Collected 1 week post visit
The questionnaire assesses patients' ratings of their own participatory communication behavior. It is a 5-item scale. The scale is scored from 1 (completely disagree) to 7 (completely agree). The higher scores indicate a better quality of communication. The scale ranges from 5 to 35.
Time frame: Collected 1 week post visit
Patient-Centered Care is measured with the Consultation Care Measure (CCM). The CCM measures patients' ratings of their provider on five subscales. The scale ranges from 21 to 105. Higher scores are associated with higher patient ratings of their provider.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 3 months post visit
Medication adherence will also be assessed with a medication possession ratio (MPR) for diabetes medications. MPR will be based on VA pharmacy data. MPR is a ratio of the number of days the patient has drug in their possession divided by the number of days in the follow-up period (MPR = days with drug / total days). The investigators will use a mean MPR for patients on multiple oral hypoglycemic medications.
Time frame: Collected at baseline and 1 week post visit
Functional Status will be assessed with the Veterans RAND-12 (VR-12), a patient-reported global-health measure of physical and mental health status and that has a non-proprietary scoring algorithm. The scale is normalized to a range from 0-100; higher scores indicate better functional status.
Time frame: Collected at pre-visit and 1 week post visit
Diabetes self-management will be measured using the Diabetes Management Self Efficacy (DMSE) scale (alpha 0.91). This scale has 20 items. The scale ranges from 20 to 80. Higher scores indicate better diabetes self-management.
Time frame: Change from baseline promis score at 1 week post visit
Patient engagement will be assessed with the PROMIS Healthcare engagement measure including 8 items. Scores range from 8-40. Higher scores indicate higher healthcare engagement for patients.
VA Office of Research and Development
Fed
Acronym: ACTIVet-2
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07702175
Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders
Osmaniye, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07672652
Diabetes Mellitus, Diabetes Mellitus (Type 2)
Izmir, Cigli, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT07576374
Acid-Base Imbalance, Acidosis
Les Abymes, Guadeloupe
View Trial DetailsNCT07557264
Behavior, Diabetes Mellitus
Valencia, Spain
View Trial Details