Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT02488317

Empowering Patients On Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (Aim 3) (EPOCH-RRT)

Empowering Patients On Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (EPOCH-RRT) study seeks to identify factors that matter the most to patients with kidney disease and study how they are impacted by different types of dialysis. The inclusion of patients, caregivers, and patient advocacy organizations as research partners will assure that the study addresses questions of greatest relevance to patients facing the need for dialysis.

For Aim 3, the investigators are going to compare measures related to the decision-making process between patients receiving and not receiving a decision aid focusing on Peritoneal Dialysis and Hemodialysis.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Chronic Kidney Disease Chronic Disease Disease Attributes Female Urogenital Diseases Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications Kidney Diseases Male Urogenital Diseases Pathologic Processes Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms Renal Insufficiency Renal Insufficiency, Chronic Urogenital Diseases Urologic Diseases

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48104, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years and older
  • Speaks English
  • Has access to the internet

Exclusion criteria

Treatment and study plan

Decision Aid

Other

Decision-making outcomes (e.g., self-efficacy) will be compared between patients who received and did not receive a decision aid. These arms were chosen because the current standard of care is for health care providers to discuss options with patients without using a decision aid.

Primary outcomes

  1. Preference for Shared Decision Making

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured using the scale from Degner, L. F., Sloan, J. A., & Venkatesh, P. (1996). The Control Preferences Scale. The Canadian journal of nursing research= Revue canadienne de recherche en sciences infirmieres, 29(3), 21-43. The CPS is a clinically relevant, easily administered, valid, and reliable measure of preferred roles in health-care decision-making. A pick-one approach was used to identify patient preference for an active, passive or collaborative role in dialysis treatment decision making.

  2. Decisional Conflict

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured using the scale from O'Connor, Annette M. "Validation of a Decisional Conflict Scale." Medical Decision Making 15, no. 1 (February 1, 1995): 25-30. 16 item scale, responses to each statement are scored from 1 (strongly agree) to 5 (strongly disagree), with negative statements having reverse scoring; thus high scores indicate higher decisional conflict. Mean score per participant is calculated across all items, subtract by 1 and multiplied by 25. Score range= 0-100. Mean scores across all participants in each arm are reported.

  3. Decision Self-efficacy

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured through the scale found in Decision Self-Efficacy Ottawa: Ottawa Hospital Research Institute; © 1995 Available from: http://decisionaid.ohri.ca/docs/develop/User_Manuals/UM_Decision_SelfEfficacy.pdf O'Connor 1995 Items are scored 0(not at all confident) to 4 (very confident). Scores are summed across 10 items, divided by 10 and multiplied by 25. Scores range from 0-100. A score of 0 means "extremely low self efficacy" and a score of 100 means "extremely high self efficacy".

  4. Knowledge

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured using scale from Cavanaugh K"Patient Dialysis Knowledge Is Associated with Permanent Arteriovenous Access Use in Chronic Hemodialysis." Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology 4, no. 5: 950-56) Multiple choice questions with one correct answer per questions. Number of correct questions reported as a percentage of total number of questions (23).

  5. Preparation for Decision Making

    Time frame: 6 months

    Measured using Bennett, Carol, "Validation of a Preparation for Decision Making Scale." Patient Education and Counseling 78, no. 1: 130-33 10 item scale, each item scored from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a great deal). items are summed and scored, converted to a 0-100 scale by subtracting 1 from the summed score and multiplying by 25. Higher scores indicate higher perceived level of preparation for decision making.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Arbor Research Collaborative for Health

Other

Collaborators

  • American Association of Kidney Patients
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • National Kidney Foundation, United States
  • Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • University of Michigan

Registry information

Official study title

Empowering Patients On Choices for Renal Replacement Therapy (Aim 3)

Acronym: EPOCH-RRT

Important dates

Study start
2015
Primary completion
2015
Study completion
2015
First posted
Jul 2, 2015
Registry last updated
May 10, 2017

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Related clinical trials

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.