La Paz University Hospital
Madrid, 28046, Spain
NCT Number: NCT04235881
The general objective of the study was to evaluate the impact of two emotional regulation programs, one standardized and face-to-face (MBSR: Mindfulness Based Stress Reduction) and, another, implemented through a mobile phone application (REM_Volver a casa; ERBM_Back home: Emotional Regulation Based on Mindfulness), on the quality of life, the state emotional and psychological and biological variables associated with stress, in a sample of patients with ICD (implantable cardioverter defibrillator).
The working hypotheses were that after training in emotional regulation, patients with ICD would have better quality of life, lower symptoms of anxiety, depression and hostility, and lower incidence of ventricular arrhythmias than patients in the control group, as well as that there would be no differences between the two tools used for training.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–75 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madrid, 28046, Spain
The recruitment process of the participants was carried out by telephone, by the medical staff of the arrhythmia's section, who informed the patients the characteristics and objectives of the study.
The sample size was estimated considering an alpha risk of 0.05 and a beta risk of 0.2, in a bilateral contrast, to detect a difference equal to or greater than 10 units in the Quality of life variable. A standard deviation of 20 points and a 20% loss rate were assumed. The estimated n was 237 patients, to distribute in three branches of 79 patients each.
Before beginning the intervention, participants were informed about the research, and were offered the opportunity to ask questions in order to clarify any doubts about it. Next, they were given a Participant Data Collection Notebook. The Notebook included the information on the investigation and the Informed Consent, to be completed and signed; the request for demographic data (age, gender, educational level, etc.); and, the four questionnaires used to assess the psychological variables of study: SF-36 (quality of life), HADS (anxiety and depression), STAXI (hostility) and FFMQ (Mindfulness) For the descriptive analysis, the number of subjects and the corresponding percentage was used in the qualitative variables. In the quantitative variables the mean and standard deviation were used when the variables adjusted to the normal distribution; otherwise, the median and interquartile range (first and third quartile) were used. The normality test used was the Shapiro-Wilk.
In the hypothesis contrast of the pre-post values, of the variables with distribution adjusted to normal, the Student´s t statistic was used for paired data; For the variables whose distribution did not conform to normal, the Wilcoxon Test was chosen.
For the contrast of inter-group hypothesis (independent samples with distribution not adjusted to normal), the Mann Whitney test was used.
For the statistical analysis of data, the SPSS program, version 20, was used.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Mindfulness training through an adaptation of the standardized MBSR program. This program was conducted in person and in a group, with a maximum of 25 participants per group and a total duration of 8 weeks. The training was carried out in 8 sessions, one each week, with a duration of 2 h each session.
The intervention was carried out through the computer application for mobile phone "REM volver a casa". This application has been developed to carry out training in the emotional regulation program based on mindfulness, autonomously. The application is designed to carry out the program in 8 weeks.
Time frame: In order to assess the change at the Quality of life variable, was measured just before starting the mindfulness training program and, eight weeks later, after finishing it.
The questionnaire (SF-36: Short Form) uses a Likert scale of 3 or 5 points, with a range of scores from 0 to 100, average of 50 and standard deviation 10.
Time frame: In order to assess the change at the anxiety and depression variables, were measured just before starting the mindfulness training program and, eight weeks later, after finishing it.
HADS: Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. This scale assess the presence of anxiety or depression. It consists of two sub-scales, of 7 items each, are scored on a Likert scale of 4 points. The cut-off points used for the two scales were: 0 to 7 = no clinical significance; from 8 to 10 = doubtful; from 11 to 14 = moderate; from 15 to 21 = severe.
Time frame: In order to assess the change at the Anger variable, was measured just before starting the mindfulness training program and, eight weeks later, after finishing it.
STAXI: State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory. Questionnaire used to evaluate the expression of hostility, in terms of personality trait and regarding the circumstantial state at the time of measurement. The scores are represented in standardized T scores: mean of 50 points and a standard deviation of 10 points.
Time frame: To assess the change in the AHR variable, the data collected corresponded to the two months before the intervention and the two months after the intervention.
Average Heart Rate (AHR).These parameters were obtained from the data record of the defibrillator implanted in each patient, and is quantified by beats per minute.
Time frame: To assess the change in the NSVT variable, the data collected corresponded to the two months before the intervention and the two months after the intervention.
Number of Non-Sustained Ventricular Tachycardia (NSVT). These parameters were obtained from the data record of the defibrillator implanted in each patient, and is quantified by whole numbers.
Time frame: The value of this parameter is recorded at the beginning of the study.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF). The ejection fraction is the force with which the left ventricle contracts and is related to the patient's prognosis and its symptomatology. This parameter is classified into four levels, according to the percentage.
Time frame: The value of this parameter is recorded at the beginning of the study.
Functional Class (FC). The functional class for dyspnea is a classification according to the degree to which patients have the feeling of shortness of breath. The functional classification is determined according to the following four levels:
Time frame: The estimated period of evaluation is up to 8 years. The events (shocks) accounted are for the period between the date of implantation of the device and the date of the last data collection, approximately 33 months after the start of the study.
Number of shocks produced by the implantable automatic defibrillator, in each patient. Events (shocks) are determined by their registration in the device (implantable automatic defibrillator). The device has a record in which it stores parameters related to the functioning of the heart and the regulation and control processes performed by the device, among them, the shocks it gives in order to restore a situation of ventricular fibrillation or ventricular arrhythmia. This parameter is quantified by whole numbers.
Time frame: To assess the change in the Daily Activity variable, the data collected corresponded to the two months before the intervention and the two months after the intervention.
Number of daily hours of activity, recorded by the implantable automatic defibrillator device. This parameter is quantified in hours.
Time frame: The data corresponding to the mindfulness attitude measured just before starting the mindfulness training program and, eight weeks later, after finishing it.
FFMQ: Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire. In this questionnaire five factors of mindfulness ability are collected: Observe, from 8 to 40 points; Describe, from 8 to 40 points; Act consciously, from 8 to 40 points; Not judge, from 8 to 40 points; and, Not react, from 7 to 35 points.
Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La Paz
Other
Efficacy of Mindfulness Training on the Quality of Life of Patients With Implantable Automatic Defibrillator
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT04559061
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Charleston, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT02761343
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrhythmia
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03049254
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06071910
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Cardiac Arrest
Norwich, United Kingdom
View Trial Details