Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04225598

Emergency Department-Initiated Buprenorphine Validation Network Trial

This study will (1) recruit, train and provide resources to approximately 30 Emergency Department (ED) sites throughout the U.S. using implementation facilitation strategies to provide ED-initiated buprenorphine (BUP) for patients presenting with opioid use disorder (OUD) who are not receiving medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD). Once implementation is adequately achieved, the sites will (2) conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to compare the effectiveness of sublingual buprenorphine (SL-BUP) versus extended-release buprenorphine (XR-BUP) on ED patients' engagement in formal addiction treatment 7-days after their ED visit. In addition, in an ancillary component of the study, the investigators will (3) assess the use of XR-BUP in ED patients with Clinical Opioid Withdrawal Scale (COWS) scores < 8 in a case series to potentially expand the eligibility of patients in the larger RCT to those presenting with little to no opioid withdrawal symptoms. Finally, the investigators will (4) develop and validate ED electronic health record (EHR) opioid-related phenotypes, both of which will inform the main RCT.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Phase 2

Primary location

Highland Hospital, Oakland, California, United States

Loading trial locations.

About this study

The study will be comprised of four components as outlined below:

  • Site implementation component:

In this component, the investigators will use previously developed implementation facilitation strategies and resources to train ED providers and staff at approximately 30 diverse EDs in treatment initiation with SL-BUP and XR-BUP and develop ED buprenorphine protocols and procedures. The investigators anticipate that this will result in a minimum of 24 sites (80%) that will meet the implementation milestones for competence in ED-initiated BUP using standard SL and XR-BUP inductions.

  • Effectiveness RCT component:

This component is a large pragmatic RCT using a Hybrid Type 1 Effectiveness-Implementation design. Sites that satisfactorily complete the site implementation component will be activated on a rolling basis for the RCT after demonstrated implementation milestones have been met. In this Hybrid Type 1 design the primary research question is the effectiveness of SL-BUP induction compared with that of XR-BUP on the primary outcome measure of engagement in formal addiction treatment at 7-days post ED visit. This design also allows us to gather information and report on implementation processes.

  • Ancillary component - XR-BUP Induction for patients with COWS < 8:

This observational case series will begin in advance of the Effectiveness RCT component at approximately 4 ED sites with extensive experience in ED-initiated BUP. The investigators will collect quantitative and qualitative data on the use of XR-BUP in ED patients with low COWS scores for approximately 75 patients. Sites will receive a supply of XR-BUP for provision to up to 5 patients with a COWS score > 8. The purpose is to pre-study the procedures at the four ancillary study sites on treating OUD patients with XR-BUP prior to initiation of the ancillary component. Data collected from this pre-study will not be included in the analysis of the ancillary and effectiveness RCT component. These initial up to 20 pre-study patients will meet all other study criteria and undergo all assessments. It is anticipated that the information collected from the 75 patients in the ancillary component will allow for modification to the larger Effectiveness RCT by expanding eligibility criteria to include patients with COWS <8.

  • Development and validation of EHR ED opioid-related phenotypes component:

In this component, the investigators will develop EHR phenotypes of opioid-related illnesses that accurately and automatically characterize patient conditions, enhance the ability to actively monitor and surveil, and better identify representative samples and patients potentially eligible for study inclusion, leading ultimately to an enhanced inclusion and understanding of opioid-related conditions. At the primary Yale New Haven Health System sites, the phenotypes (rules- and machine learning-based) will be iteratively developed and internally validated. The rules-based phenotype will be mapped to a common data model and externally validated at 4 trial sites.

  • An exploratory outcome of this study will be to assess the impact of COVID-19 on ED use for opioid-related diagnoses using EHR data.

The primary focus of this clinicaltrials.gov registration are the RCT outcomes. Implementation and ancillary outcomes will be identified as secondary outcomes for the purpose of this clinicaltrials.gov registration

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

RCT Component:

Inclusion criteria

  • Be 18 years or older
  • Treated in the ED during study screening hours
  • Meet DSM-5 (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual) diagnostic criteria for moderate to severe OUD
  • Have a COWS score of > or equal to 4
  • Have a urine toxicology test that is positive for opioids (opiates, oxycodone, buprenorphine). Patients with urines that are only positive for fentanyl will be eligible if their clinical history and physical exam are consistent with opioid use and they meet DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD.
  • Able to speak English sufficiently to understand the study the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study. (Exception may be made if sites with large population of Spanish speaking patients are accepted for participation in the study and study materials are translated into Spanish. Translated study materials will be reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board) IRB of record prior to use.)

Exclusion criteria

  • Have urine toxicology test that is positive for methadone
  • Be pregnant as determined by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) testing at the index ED visit
  • Have a medical or psychiatric condition that requires hospitalization
  • Opioid administration (excluding BUP) at the index ED visit, prior to enrollment, and COWS remains < 8 during ED stay
  • Be actively suicidal or severely cognitively impaired precluding informed consent
  • Present from an extended care facility (e.g., skilled nursing facility)
  • Require continued prescription opioids for a pain condition
  • Be a prisoner or in police custody at the time of index ED visit
  • Be currently (anytime within the past 14 days) enrolled in formal addiction treatment, including by court order. Patients enrolled in formal addiction who are not receiving MOUD are eligible
  • Be unable to provide reliable locator information including 2 contact numbers in addition to their own
  • Be unwilling to follow study procedures (e.g., unwilling to provide permission to contact referral provider/program or unavailable for the follow-up assessments)
  • Have prior enrollment in the current study component

Ancillary Component:

Inclusion criteria

  • Be 18 years or older
  • Treated in the ED during study screening hours
  • Meet DSM-5 diagnostic criteria for moderate to severe opioid use disorder
  • Have a COWS <8
  • Have a urine toxicology test that is positive for opioids (opiates, oxycodone, or buprenorphine). Patients with urines that are only positive for fentanyl on the point of care test strip will be eligible if their clinical history and physical exam are consistent with opioid use and they meet DSM-5 criteria for moderate to severe OUD.
  • Be able to speak English sufficiently to understand the study procedures and provide written informed consent to participate in the study

Exclusion criteria

  • Have a urine toxicology test that is positive for methadone
  • Be pregnant as determined by human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) testing at the index ED visit
  • Have a medical or psychiatric condition that requires hospitalization at the index ED visit, prior to enrollment
  • Be actively suicidal or severely cognitively impaired precluding informed consent
  • Present from an extended care facility (e.g., skilled nursing facility)
  • Require continued prescription opioids for a pain condition
  • Be a prisoner or in police custody at the time of index ED visit
  • Be currently (anytime within the past 7 days) enrolled in formal addiction treatment, including by court order. Patients enrolled in formal addiction treatment but are not receiving MOUD are eligible
  • Be unable to provide reliable locator information including 2 contact numbers in addition to their own
  • Be unwilling to follow study procedures (e.g., unwilling to provide permission to answer daily assessments until day 7)
  • Have prior enrollment in the current study

Treatment and study plan

CAM2038

Drug

Patients will receive a 24 mg dose of injectable CAM2038 in the ED on Day 0.

Buprenorphine Sublingual Product

Drug

COWS ≥ 8: Patients will receive 4mg of SL-BUP for a COWS score of 8-12 (mild withdrawal). After 30-45 minutes if tolerated and no unanticipated adverse reactions, an additional 4mg can be administered for a total of 8mg in the ED. Patients presenting with moderate-severe withdrawal (COWS >≥ 13) will receive an initial dose of 8mg SL-BUP. All patients will receive a buprenorphine prescription and instructions for additional BUP doses to allow for up to a dose of 12mg if needed, and for 16mg each subsequent day until their scheduled follow up appointment for ongoing MOUD (medications for opioid use disorder).

COWS 4-7: Patients will be provided with a uniform set of instructions to guide unobserved (home) induction. They will be prescribed doses of SL-BUP to allow them to take dose up to 12mg in the 24 hours after discharge. All patients will also receive a buprenorphine prescription for 16mg each subsequent day until their scheduled follow up appointment for ongoing MOUD.

Primary outcomes

  1. RCT Component: Patient engagement (yes/no) in formal addiction treatment at 7 days post randomization

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    Engagement in formal addiction treatment will be defined as enrollment and receiving formal addiction treatment on the 7th day post randomization, confirmed by contact with the facility and/or treating clinician. Formal addiction treatment will be operationally defined as those treatments consistent with the American Society of Addiction Medicine's levels of care (1-4) and can include a range of clinical settings including office-based providers of BUP or naltrexone, opioid treatment programs (OTPs), intensive outpatient, inpatient, or residential treatments. Patients do not need to be receiving MOUD at 7 days to be considered engaged in formal addiction treatment. Participation in a mutual-help program such as Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) or (Narcotics Anonymous) NA alone will not be considered as engagement in formal addiction treatment. Additional analyses evaluating the effects of patient and site characteristics will also be conducted.

Secondary outcomes

  1. RCT Component: Engagement in MOUD (yes/no) at 7 days post randomization

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    self-report verified with treatment provider(s)

  2. RCT Component: Patient engagement (yes/no) in formal addiction treatment at 30 days post randomization

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    Engagement in formal addiction treatment will be defined as enrollment in formal addiction treatment on the 30th day post randomization, confirmed by direct contact with the facility and/or treating clinician. Formal addiction treatment will be operationally defined as those treatments consistent with the American Society of Addiction Medicine's levels of care (1-4) and can include a range of clinical settings including office-based providers of BUP or naltrexone, OTPs, intensive outpatient, inpatient, or residential treatments. Patients do not need to be receiving MOUD on the 30th day post randomization to be considered engaged in formal addiction treatment. Participation in a mutual-help program such as Alcoholics or Narcotics Anonymous alone will not be considered as engagement in formal addiction treatment. Additional analyses evaluating the effects of patient and site characteristics will also be conducted.

  3. RCT Component: Patient Engagement in MOUD (yes/no) at 30 days post randomization

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    self report verified with treatment provider(s)

  4. RCT Component: Self-reported days of illicit opioid use (past 7 days) at 7 days post randomization

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    The Timeline Follow-back procedure will be used to elicit the patient participant's self-reported days of use of opioids.

  5. RCT Component: Self-reported days of illicit opioid use (past 7 days) at 30 days post randomization

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    The Timeline Follow-back procedure will be used to elicit the patient participant's self-reported days of use of opioids.

  6. RCT Component: Craving scores at 7 days post randomization

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    The investigators will use visual analogue scales (VAS) to assess craving, desire to use opioids and need to use opioids with a scale of 0-100.

  7. RCT Component: Healthcare services utilization (past 30 days) regarding ED visits and hospitalizations at 30 days post randomization

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    A brief, structured interview regarding health care utilization (inpatient and outpatient) will be used, which collects information on the type and amount of services received. This includes ED visits, hospitalizations, primary medical care visits (excluding those for BUP treatment and self-help sources of support (e.g., NA).

  8. RCT Component: Patient satisfaction with BUP at 7 days post randomization

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    The investigators will modify the patient satisfaction scale where overall experience is rated from 1 to 5 (1 is completely ineffective and 5 is completely effective) and treatment characteristics are rated 1 to 7 (1 is not important and 7 is extremely important) based on previous published data.

  9. RCT Component: Overdose Events at 30 days post randomization

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    Assessment of past 30-day overdose events will be completed at 30 days post study enrollment. In addition, Site PIs will search local electronic medical records for fatal and non-fatal overdose events.

  10. Ancillary Component: Proportion of participants that experience a 5 or greater increase in COWS score within 4 hours of of XR-BUP administration

    Time frame: Within 4 hours of XR-BUP administration

    Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) - the COWS is a validated measure of the severity of opioid withdrawal that consists of 11 subjective and objective items. Scores on the individual items are combined to a single overall score that has been used to determine the SL-BUP induction strategy. COWS scoring, and interpretation is as follows: Score: 5-12 = mild opioid withdrawal; 13-24 = moderate opioid withdrawal; 25-36 = moderately severe opioid withdrawal; more than 36 = severe opioid withdrawal.

  11. Ancillary Component: Proportion of participants that transition to moderate withdrawal (COWS 13-24) within 4 hours of XR-BUP administration

    Time frame: Within 4 hours of XR-BUP administration

    Clinical Opiate Withdrawal Scale (COWS) - the COWS is a validated measure of the severity of opioid withdrawal that consists of 11 subjective and objective items. Scores on the individual items are combined to a single overall score that has been used to determine the SL-BUP induction strategy. COWS scoring, and interpretation is as follows: Score: 5-12 = mild opioid withdrawal; 13-24 = moderate opioid withdrawal; 25-36 = moderately severe opioid withdrawal; more than 36 = severe opioid withdrawal.

  12. Ancillary Component: Proportion of participants that experience clinician determined precipitated withdrawal within 1 hour of XR-BUP administration

    Time frame: Within 1 hour post XR-BUP injection

    Assessment of Proportion of participants that experience clinician determined precipitated withdrawal within 1 hour of XR-BUP administration.

Other outcomes

  1. RCT Component: Cost effectiveness of XR-BUP compared to SL-BUP using ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio): Engagement

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    The final outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis is the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), which includes the relevant cost differential between the study arms in the numerator, and the difference in a chosen effectiveness measure in the denominator. 3 types of ICERs will be generated, each one with a different effectiveness measure (engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained; and Abstinent Years). The reason being that different ICERs are more relevant to certain potential stakeholder groups than others.

  2. RCT Component: Cost effectiveness of XR-BUP compared to SL-BUP using ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio): QALYs

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    The final outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis is the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), which includes the relevant cost differential between the study arms in the numerator, and the difference in a chosen effectiveness measure in the denominator. 3 types of ICERs will be generated, each one with a different effectiveness measure (engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained; and Abstinent Years). The reason being that different ICERs are more relevant to certain potential stakeholder groups than others.

  3. RCT Component: Cost effectiveness of XR-BUP compared to SL-BUP using ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio): Abstinent Years

    Time frame: 7 days post randomization

    The final outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis is the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), which includes the relevant cost differential between the study arms in the numerator, and the difference in a chosen effectiveness measure in the denominator. 3 types of ICERs will be generated, each one with a different effectiveness measure (engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained; and Abstinent Years). The reason being that different ICERs are more relevant to certain potential stakeholder groups than others.

  4. RCT Component: Cost effectiveness of XR-BUP compared to SL-BUP using ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio): Engagement

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    The final outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis is the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), which includes the relevant cost differential between the study arms in the numerator, and the difference in a chosen effectiveness measure in the denominator. 3 types of ICERs will be generated, each one with a different effectiveness measure (engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained; and Abstinent Years). The reason being that different ICERs are more relevant to certain potential stakeholder groups than others.

  5. RCT Component: Cost effectiveness of XR-BUP compared to SL-BUP using ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio): QALYs

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    The final outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis is the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), which includes the relevant cost differential between the study arms in the numerator, and the difference in a chosen effectiveness measure in the denominator. 3 types of ICERs will be generated, each one with a different effectiveness measure (engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained; and Abstinent Years). The reason being that different ICERs are more relevant to certain potential stakeholder groups than others.

  6. RCT Component: Cost effectiveness of XR-BUP compared to SL-BUP using ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio): Abstinent Years

    Time frame: 30 days post randomization

    The final outcome measure for the cost-effectiveness analysis is the ICER (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio), which includes the relevant cost differential between the study arms in the numerator, and the difference in a chosen effectiveness measure in the denominator. 3 types of ICERs will be generated, each one with a different effectiveness measure (engagement in formal addiction treatment at 30 days; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained; and Abstinent Years). The reason being that different ICERs are more relevant to certain potential stakeholder groups than others.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Yale University

Other

Collaborators

  • Alameda Health System
  • Harvard Medical School (HMS and HSDM)
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • NYU Langone Health
  • National Drug Abuse Treatment Clinical Trials Network
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
  • The Emmes Company, LLC
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Weill Medical College of Cornell University

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2024
Study completion
2024
First posted
Jan 13, 2020
Registry last updated
Jan 10, 2025

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.