Odense University Hospital
Odense, 5000, Denmark
NCT Number: NCT06571890
Emergence agitation is a significant and persistent challenge in paediatric anaesthesia, especially in children of preschool age.
In this study, the investigators examined whether anaesthesia titration with either a sleep depth monitor or a pain monitor would result in changed postoperative agitation rates, measured via the Richmond Agitation and Sedation Score (RASS).
93 children participated. The participants were divided into three groups: A conventional anaesthesia group, an EEG (Electroencephalography)- monitored and a pain-monitored group. The pain-monitored children received the most pain medication but were discharged at the same rate as the other children with unchanged rates of nausea and vomiting and less agitation than the sleep-monitored children.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me1 year–6 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Odense, 5000, Denmark
Healthy preschool outpatients assigned for abdominal/inguinal hernia and cryptorchidism repairs participated after parental consent.
One group received standard anaesthesia induction and maintenance, according to the usual ward regimen. This was done with sevoflurane inhalation, fentanyl bolus and a laryngeal mask airway (Standard group, STD group)
The second group received standard anaesthesia as well only this time the sevoflurane titration was guided via the Nacotrend bispectral index monitor, towards a narcotrend index of 2-4. (Narcotrend group, NCT group)
The third group also received standard anaesthesia and was additionally monitored with a Mdoloris Anaesthesia Nociception Index (ANI) monitor for perioperative nociception. When a nociceptive threshold was exceeded, an extra bolus of fentanyl of 1 mcg/kg was given (ANI group)
All children were then escorted to the postoperative care unit for wakeup. A Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale score (RASS-score) was made every 15 minutes until discharge. This was analysed with Kaplan-Meyer mortality graph, along with usual statistics of secondary outcomes.
The children in the ANI group received the least fentanyl and were discharged no later than all the other children.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
A bispectral index anaesthesia monitor collects simplified EEG via forehead electrodes and displays an index of 0-100, where an index of 40-60 is considered optimal
A heart rate variability-based nociception monitor collects ECG-signal from electrodes on the patient's chest and displays an index of 0-100 where an index below 50 is considered nociceptive.
Time frame: During postoperative care unit (PACU) stay within 0-8 hours
Scoring system for sedation and agitation from -5 til +4.
Time frame: Within 48 hours of hospital admission
Time spent with anesthesia, PACU stay and total time.
Time frame: Within 48 hours of hospital admission
Given during the anesthesia against postoperative pain
Time frame: Within the duration of PACU stay of 0-8 hours
A Visual-Analogue-Scale score (VAS score) assessed by PACU nurses. A score from 0-10 where 10 represents worst pain.
Time frame: Within the duration of PACU stay of 0-8 hours
Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV). A score from 0-2 where 2 represents worst nausea and vomiting.
Time frame: During the first 24 postoperative hours
Other drugs, such as NSAIDs, given
University of Southern Denmark
Other
Emergence Agitation in Paediatric Day Care Surgery: A Randomised, Single-blinded Study Comparing Narcotrend and Heart Rate Variability With Standard Monitoring
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06161662
Anesthesia, Confusion
Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
View Trial DetailsNCT06323616
Anesthesia, Anesthesia Awareness
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT02856594
Anesthesia, Confusion
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06545786
Anesthesia, Confusion
Moscow, Moscow Oblast, Russia
View Trial Details