Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
NCT Number: NCT05086705
This trial studies how well EMBr Wave technology works in reducing hot flashes in women with a history of breast cancer. Hot flashes are a common symptom experienced by menopausal women. The standard treatment for hot flashes is hormone replacement therapy, however hormone replacement therapy cannot be used in women with a history of, or active, breast cancer. EMBr Wave is a personal heating and cooling device worn on the wrist. EMBr Wave may help reduce hot flash severity in women with a history of breast cancer.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE:
I. To evaluate the feasibility of using EMBr Wave technology in women with a history of breast cancer who are experiencing bothersome hot flashes.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To evaluate the preliminary efficacy of EMBr Wave in reducing hot flash severity and frequency in women with a history of breast cancer.
II. To identify in what ways EMBr Wave has the greatest potential efficacy, such as reduction in vasomotor symptoms (VMS) severity, frequency, duration, sense of control, or self-esteem.
III. To estimate effect sizes to inform power calculations for a future phase III trial.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.
ARM A: Patients utilize the EMBr Wave device for 4 weeks, then crossover to arm B for 4 weeks.
ARM B: Patients receive no treatment for 4 weeks, then crossover to arm A for 4 weeks.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Use EMBr Wave
Ancillary studies
Time frame: Up to 8 weeks
Feasibility will be evaluated primarily with respect to device usage. The proportion of patients who wear the device for at least 8 hours between 8:00 am and 8:00 pm for at least 22 days will be estimated using the entire sample and a 95% Jeffreys interval for binomial proportions will be computed.
Time frame: At 8 weeks
Feasibility will be evaluated secondarily with respect to patient satisfaction. The mean patient satisfaction scores for each Likert-type question and proportion of patients reporting satisfaction scores at or above 7 will be estimated in the entire sample and compared between sequence groups at the 5% significance level (two-sided).Rated on a 10-point Likert scale with 10 being most satisfied or most effective.
Time frame: At week 4 and at week 8
Reported via patient reported outcomes, primarily Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS), a scale of 0-10 with 0 being no interference (best outcome) and 10 being completely interfere (worst outcome). Survey administered on paper or via RedCap survey distribution at week 4 and week 8.
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
Other
Cool Down With EMBr: Enhancing Menopausal Hot Flash Symptom Reduction After Breast Cancer
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT02961790
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Carcinoma
Peoria, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06184750
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Atypical Ductal Hyperplasia
Tucson, Arizona, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05941520
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Atypical Hyperplasia
Duarte, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06195306
Adenocarcinoma, Breast Atypical Hyperplasia
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
View Trial Details