Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Location status: Recruiting
NCT Number: NCT07284290
The proposed study aims to address the critical gaps in understanding the mechanisms of CF (Cognitive Fluctuations) by leveraging recently emerged molecular biomarkers, advanced neuroimaging techniques to assess measures of cholinergic degeneration, and synchronous EEG and assessments of attention. One of the overarching innovations of study is combining all of these assessments into one integrated research plan
Interested in participating?
Request Info50 year–89 year
All sexes
Interventional
Phase 4
Richmond, Virginia, 23298, United States
Location status: Recruiting
Aim 1 is a cross-sectional case control study in which cholinergic degeneration in 45 participants with DLB or PDD with CF will be compared to a group of 45 individuals with Lewy Body disease without CF and 30 healthy controls. The first 20 participants who are eligible for Aim 2 and consent will also participate in an 8-week pre-post interventional cohort study immediately following Aim 1 procedures. For Aim 3, Aim 1 participants will complete annual follow-up evaluations for 2 years to understand factors influencing the change in cognitive fluctuations over time.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Arm 1:
Exclusion criteria
Arm 1
Inclusion criteria
Arm 2 (Cholinesterase inhibitor cohort) inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria
Arm 2 (Cholinesterase inhibitor cohort) exclusion criteria:
Inclusion criteria
Arm 3 (Healthy Controls)
Exclusion criteria
Arm 3 (Healthy Controls)
Detects phosphorylated alpha synuclein in cutaneous nerve fibrils which has >95% sensitivity in detecting DLB
Functional MRI used to investigate the network connectivity changes associated with alterations in the cholinergic system. Using this comprehensive methodology to establish cholinergic degeneration's contribution to CF provides a robust framework for future research and therapeutic strategies.
Implementing prolonged EEG monitoring, to capture dynamic changes in neural activity associated with CF. The methods are designed avoid the limitations identified in a systematic review of EEG studies in DLB, as will use quantitative analysis of EEG, uniformly apply diagnostic criteria, and consider the confounding effects of medications.
Concurrent evaluation of PVT performance and EEG This dual assessment will correlate cognitive and neurophysiological dynamics in real-time, providing a more holistic understanding of CF over time and the functional brain activity that underlies them. Temporal integration of PVT with EEG data collection will enable the identity of specific correlates of CF.
A blood sample will be collected and sent for processing by C2N Diagnostics for the detection of Aβ42/40 and p-tau217 via mass spectrometry, a method shown to be highly accurate for predicting amyloid positivity on PET (AUC=0.94). Exploratory Biomarkers: The additional blood sample will be used for analysis of exploratory biomarkers and future research. A total of up to 20mL of blood will be taken.
20 participants from the arm 1. Participants will take 1 capsule daily of galantamine 8mg ER for 4 weeks and then increase to 2 capsules daily of galantamine 8mg ER (16mg) for 4 weeks. This titration will mitigate potential for cholinergic side effects. At 2 weeks, 4 weeks and 6 weeks of the treatment period, safety and compliance will be assessed during phone call visits. Any adverse event rated as Grade 2 or greater according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v5.0 and that is definitely or possibly attributable to the study drug will result in study drug withdrawal or dose reduction.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, ChEI Cohort Day 56, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The scoring for the Clinical Assessment of Fluctuations (CAF) is a two-step process that uses both a frequency and a duration score. The two scores are multiplied together to get the final severity rating. A higher score indicates more severe cognitive fluctuations. After rating the frequency and duration, the two scores are multiplied to get the final CAF score.
Frequency score x Duration score=Total CAF score
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, ChEI Cohort Day 56, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The DCFS-R is measured as a total score from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating more severe cognitive fluctuations in dementia. It is calculated by summing a nurse's ratings on four items, each scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1=no difference, 5=very large difference). The four items assess the difference between a person's best and worst functioning, which includes daytime somnolence, drowsiness, and altered levels of consciousness.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, ChEI Cohort Day 56, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The four questions included in the Mayo Fluctuations Scale have been found to significantly differentiate Alzheimer's Disease from DLB. Positive items are summed to create a "fluctuations composite score" with a score of 3 or 4 associated with DLB.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The FAQ is a number from 0 to 30 that represents a person's independence in daily tasks, with higher scores indicating more difficulty. The score is calculated by summing the ratings (0-3) for 10 activities, and a cut-off score of 9 or higher is often used to suggest potential cognitive or functional impairment.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The MDS-UPDRS is a tool that measures the experiences of daily living (Part I), motor experiences of daily living (Part II), motor examination (Part III), and motor complications (Part IV). Scores range from 0 to 260, with 0 indicating no disability and higher scores indicating greater disability. The individual parts are rated on a scale of 0 to 4, with higher scores indicating greater impairment.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The RBDSQ is measured by a total from 0-13, with a score of 5 or higher indicating a positive result for REM Sleep Behavior Disorder (RBD). The questionnaire is a 10-item self-rating tool to screen for RBD, and the cutoff score can vary depending on the population being screened.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The NPI is an interview performed with a caregiver to assess any changes in the participants' behavior related to delusions, hallucinations, anxiety, and apathy. It is comprised of 4 main questions, 31 sub-questions and frequency/severity ratings.
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The eSAPS-PD is used to measure the severity of hallucinations and delusions in patients with Parkinson's Disease Psychosis (PDP). Scored on a scale of 0 to 5 for each of its 9 items, resulting in a total score from 0 to 45. Each item is rated based on the severity of the symptom, with a score of 0 meaning "None" and a score of 5 meaning "Severe".
Time frame: Screening, Baseline, 1 year follow-up visit, and 2 year follow-up visit
The PHQ-9 is a self-report measure used to screen for and assess the severity of depression in adults. It consists of nine questions based on the diagnostic criteria for major depressive disorder in the DSM-5. The total score for the PHQ-9 can range from 0 to 27. Each of the nine items is scored based on the frequency with which a person has experienced a specific symptom over the past two weeks: 0: Not at all, 1: Several days, 2: More than half the days, 3: Nearly every day. The scores for all nine items are added together to produce a total severity score. While scores of 10 or higher have high sensitivity and specificity for identifying major depression, the PHQ-9 alone is not a diagnostic tool. A clinical interview is necessary for a definitive diagnosis.
Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.
Virginia Commonwealth University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06098612
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Charlestown, Massachusetts, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06389032
Basal Ganglia Diseases, Brain Diseases
Chicago, Illinois, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05222386
Autonomic Nervous System Diseases, Basal Ganglia Diseases
Rochester, New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06471660
Alzheimer Disease, Arterial Occlusive Diseases
Eugene, Oregon, United States
View Trial Details