Hôpital Laval
Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5, Canada
NCT Number: NCT00874965
This study was designed to test the following hypothesis:
The benefit of electrostimulation training will be greater than sham stimulation training in term of muscle strength and mass (muscle hypertrophy), exercise tolerance, reduction of ventilation during exercise and quality of life in COPD patients
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me55 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Québec, Quebec, G1V4G5, Canada
Background: Because it has little impact on ventilatory requirements and dyspnea, muscle electrostimulation appears as a promising alternative to general physical reconditioning in advanced COPD and its feasibility has been confirmed in this population. However, the physiological mechanisms underlying the proposed benefits of electrostimulation training have not been explored.
Objective: To evaluate in COPD patients the physiological mechanisms of changes in exercise tolerance after electrostimulation training.
Method: We propose to conduct a controlled, randomized and double blind clinical trial comparing the efficacy of muscle electrostimulation training of the lower limbs to sham training in 24 patients with COPD. Patients are included in either 6 weeks of electrostimulation training (active treatment group) or 6 weeks of sham electrostimulation. Before and after training, patients perform endurance shuttle walking test, muscle function testing, muscle biopsy, blood sampling and health-related quality of life questionnaire.
Planning analysis: The main outcome will be change in the strength of the quadriceps over the 6-week electrostimulation program. The other end-points will be mid-thigh and calf muscle cross-sectional area, lower limb muscle endurance, ventilation, dyspnea, leg fatigue, operational lung volumes at iso-time and walking time during an endurance shuttle walk, muscle hypertrophying/atrophying pathways and muscle aerobic capacity. For each group, pre- and post-training comparisons will be made using a repeated measures design. The magnitude of the pre- and post-training changes will also compared between both groups with a two-way ANOVA (group, training effect) with repeated measures on the second factor (training effect). A p value < 0.05 will be considered statistically significant.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
50Hz; 0.4 ms; 30 min; 5 times / week
30 min; 5 times / week
Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks
Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks
Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks
Time frame: 6 to 8 weeks
Laval University
Other
Study of the Benefits of Lower Limb Electrostimulation Training on Muscular Parameters and Minute Ventilation During Exercise in Severe and Deconditioned COPD Patients.
Acronym: ESTIM
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06040086
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT01917331
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Szeged, Hungary
View Trial DetailsNCT06897748
Chronic Disease, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)
Aramil, Russia
View Trial DetailsNCT04119934
Behavior, Chronic Disease
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
View Trial Details