Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Recruiting

NCT Number: NCT07386236

Electrophysiological Representations of Odor Identity Study 2

To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity.

Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Experiments for this aim will acquire perceptual responses while manipulating perceptual similarity. In Experiment 1A, we will examine features of neural responses during natural behavior of freely naming odors. In Experiment 1B, we will manipulate perceptual similarity with odor metamers and collect perceptual and neural data on each trial. Preliminary data suggest that the earliest, high-frequency components of the piriform response can optimally decode perceptual identity.

Recruiting

Interested in participating?

Request Info

Key information

Age range

12 year–65 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Northwestern University

Chicago, Illinois, 60611, United States

Location status: Recruiting

Location contact

Naelly Arriaga

CONTACT

[email protected]

312-503-7244

About this study

Olfactory perception relies on the brain's ability to extract and represent different features of an odor stimulus.

For example, intensity and identity are fundamental features of the olfactory percept that must be encoded separately for accurate perception; the same odor can be encountered at different strengths. Understanding neural representations of olfactory perceptual features is fundamental to understanding the olfactory system, however the neural correlates of odor intensity and identity are poorly understood in the human brain.

The field of olfaction typically uses chemistry as a proxy for perception and focuses on manipulating physical properties of a stimulus to look for neural correlates. For example, chemical concentration and molecular identity are typically used as proxies for odor intensity and identity. However, the world that animals perceive is not a complete representation of physical reality; it is a product of the particular sensory systems that each species has acquired in the course of evolution. To understand how the brain forms representations of perceptual features of odors, we must identify relationships between features of neural responses and perceptual ratings.

While novel behavioral paradigms in rodents can provide good estimates of perceptual ratings of different features of odors (intensity, identity), humans can directly provide perceptual ratings of different features of an odor. Therefore, human work is necessary to fully understand olfactory perception.

The missing link between neural signatures and perceptual properties of odor is a critical gap in our understanding of odor coding. Here, we will combine human intracranial recordings-including direct neural recordings from human olfactory cortex-with simultaneous delivery of precisely controlled odors of varying intensity/identity and trial-by-trial collection of psychophysical ratings to understand how odors are represented in the human brain. Accurate olfactory psychophysical ratings are a critical part of our proposal. Therefore, we will work with leading experts in human psychophysics at Monel Chemical Senses Center, Dr. Pamela Dalton and Dr. Joel Mainland. As Co-Investigators on this grant, their expertise in human psychophysics will combine with my lab's expertise in human olfactory electrophysiology to provide the field with an understanding of the mappings between olfactory perception and neural codes in the human brain. To identify a neural representation of odor identity, it is necessary to dissociate molecular structure from perceptual identity/similarity.

Whether the olfactory system employs a coding scheme in which the similarity between neural features is systematically related to perceptual similarity is unknown. Experiments for this aim will acquire perceptual responses while manipulating perceptual similarity. In Experiment 1A, we will examine features of neural responses during natural behavior of freely naming odors. In Experiment 1B, we will manipulate perceptual similarity with odor metamers and collect perceptual and neural data on each trial. Preliminary data suggest that the earliest, high-frequency components of the piriform response can optimally decode perceptual identity.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Ages 12 to 65, english speaker, patients undergoing brain surgery for treatment of medically intractable epilepsy

Exclusion criteria

  • screening for history of smell or taste problems

Treatment and study plan

odor

Behavioral

present odor

Primary outcomes

  1. Perceived odor identity

    Time frame: 15 minutes

    Odors of different identities will be presented, and we will obtain behavioral perceptual ratings

Study contacts

Contact information is provided by the study sponsor or research team.

Naelly Arriaga, MPH

CONTACT

[email protected]

312-503-7244

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Northwestern University

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Electrophysiological Representations of Odor in the Human Brain Study 2

Important dates

Study start
2025
Primary completion
2028
Study completion
2028
First posted
Feb 4, 2026
Registry last updated
Feb 4, 2026

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.