Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT01009528

Electronic Feedback on Diabetic Care to General Practitioners

The aim of this study is to determine whether electronic feedback to general practitioners on quality of Type 2-Diabetes care increases the quality of care measured on process and outcome measures contained in the national guidelines. Effect evaluation will be performed using a mixed method design.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

40 year–70 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Interventional

Phase

Not applicable

Primary location

Dept. of General Medicine, Institute of Public Health, Aarhus University

Aarhus, 8000, Denmark

About this study

Background: In an effort to optimize diabetes care in general practice, an electronical feedback system has been developed. The system will be evaluated both quantitative and qualitative.

Method: The general practitioners (GP´s) of the Region of Southern Denmark have been randomised to either admission or no admission to the electronic feedback system. The system was launched 1/3-2007 and ran for one year prior to evaluation.

Quantitative evaluation by assessment of the following end-points: Patients Hba1c-level, number of patients who have had their hba1c-level measured within the last year, cholesterol-level and number of patients who have had an eye examination within the last year.

Qualitative evaluation by interviewing GP´s who have had admission to the system.

Qualitative data have been collected through interviews with intervention GPs, designed to uncover motivational factors as well as barriers concerning the use of feedback on chronic care in general practice. Data are being analyzed.

Quantitative data are being gathered. Perspective: This project will shed light on the value of electronic feedback systems within chronic care in general practice.

Based on this project it will be possible to set up a system for automatic electronic monitoring and feedback of the quality of care in general practice, taking motivational factors of the GP s into account during implementation.

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Prevalent Type 2-diabetes as confirmed by Primary Care Physician.
  • Patient alive throughout the intervention period.
  • GP actively working throughout the intervention period (not retired).

Exclusion criteria

  • death during intervention
  • moved out of geographic area during intervention
  • GP retired during intervention

Treatment and study plan

Electronic feedback system on diabetes care

Device

An electronic feedback system was introduced in randomized primary care clinics providing an overview of quality of care. The intervention ran for 15 months.

Other names: Electronic feedback system, Decission support system

Primary outcomes

  1. Outcome and process measures from the danish diabetes guideline

    Time frame: 1/3 2007-1/6 2008

Secondary outcomes

  1. Interview data concerning the impact of the electronic feedback system in the intervention clinics

    Time frame: 1/3 2007-1/6 2008

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

University of Aarhus

Other

Registry information

Official study title

Development and Evaluation of Electronic Feedback, a Tool for Quality Assurance of the Diabetic Care in General Practice

Important dates

Study start
2007
Primary completion
2008
Study completion
2009
First posted
Nov 6, 2009
Registry last updated
Nov 9, 2009

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.