NCT Number: NCT07257432
A Spilt Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation Of The Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy Comparison of traditional local anesthesia with electronic local anesthesia in terms of the ability to reduce pain during injection and the duration of the anesthetic effect
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me20 year–30 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Al Andalus University, Tartus, Al Kadmous, Syria
Study Design:
The mouth will be split in half using a split mouth study. The lower anterior teeth will be injected with a conventional local anesthetic syringe on one side, and the patient will be injected with an electronic anesthetic syringe on the other side.
The study will be conducted on a sample of volunteers aged 18 to 30 years at the Faculty of Dentistry at Al-Andalus University.
The objectives and procedure will be explained to each group of patients, and informed consent will be obtained from each patient to accept the research procedures.
A 2% non-vasoconstrictor lidocaine local anesthetic will be used for all patients.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
". Age ranged from 20 to 30 years , no menstrual cycle, The participants were not allergic to local anesthetics, had not used medication that would alter pain perception, none of them had not ever experienced Smartject injection before, and none of them were alcoholics or smokers, The participants were not allergic to local anesthetics.
Exclusion criteria
allergic to local anesthetics ,females during menstural cycle ,bad oral care.
Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side, while Smartject was used on the experimental side
Other names: anesthesia pen x
During the appointment, the subjects randomly received 1.8 ml of 2% plain lidocaine for the Intraoral Mental nerve block on both sides (experimental and control). A Carpule syringe with an aspiration and short needles 30G were used on the control side
Other names: surgimax
Time frame: 2 month
was considered as the period between the end of the injection and the first subsequent Onset time was considered as the period between the end of the injection and the first subsequent readings without response. After this period, the tooth was tested every 10 minutes until readings returned to the baseline threshold. Each subject was asked to record the time of return to normal sensation in the lower lip
Time frame: 2 month
VAS uses a straight horizontal line of extent measuring 10 cm. The ends state the maximum limit of pain orientated from the best (right) to the worst (left) so that the patient can indicate the intensity of the pain (0-100). The intensity of pain is made by measuring the dimension from "no pain" to "very severe pain" based on the patient's signs
Time frame: 2 month
was asked to record the time of return to normal sensation in the lower lip
Mouetaz Kheirallah
Other
a Spilt Mouth Clinical Comparative Evaluation of the Electronic Anesthetic Efficacy
Acronym: ArabUST
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT06968325
Pain Perception, Root Resorption
Baghdad, Iraq
View Trial DetailsNCT06847880
Biomarkers, Pain Perception
Baghdad, Baghdad Governorate, Iraq
View Trial DetailsNCT07693764
Dental Anxiety in Children, Pain Perception
Muscat, Oman
View Trial DetailsNCT07640607
Central Sensitization, Fibromyalgia
View Trial Details