Electrolysis Technique vs Manual Therapy in Pelvic Pain

Dyspareunia is painful sexual intercourse and causes could be related to musculoskeletal pelvic floor muscles disorders (tenderness, trigger points, scars). There is evidence that manual therapy and intratissue percutaneous electrolysis can be effective for musculoskeletal pain disorders affecting muscles, tendons and fascias of the extremities but they have not been evaluated in pelvic floor muscle pain syndrome. The aim of this study is to compare manual therapy and EPI in the treatment of pelvic pain in women with dyspareunia.

Pelvic floor manual therapy is a clinical approach utilizing specifics hands-on mobilizing techniques to treat soft tissues. Pelvic floor mobilization is a slow controlled process of soft-tissue (myofascial) stretching intended to improve bio-mechanical elasticity.

EPI technique consists in an ultrasound-guided application of a galvanic electrolytic current that causes a controlled local inflammatory process in the target tissue. This allows for phagocytosis and the subsequent regeneration of the affected tissue.

Inclusion criteria

• women with pain in the perineal area at an average intensity of 5 or more on the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) during penetration or during pelvic examination, which is indicative of moderate to severe pain
• At least three months postpartum or any gynecology surgery

Exclusion criteria

• pregnancy
• active urinary or vaginal infection
• pelvic pathology associated with a lower genital pain problem (e.g. deep dyspareunia) and constant, spontaneous vulvar pain
• younger than 18 or older than 65 years
• previous interventions with steroid injections
• fibromyalgia syndrome