Anterior-posterior electrode position
DeviceEscalating energy shocks (100 J, 150 J, 200 J, 360 J) using anterior-posterior electrode position
Other names: LIFEPAK 20, Physio-Control/Stryker
NCT Number: NCT03817372
Atrial fibrillation is the most common heart rhythm disorder, and the incidence is rapidly increasing. Cardioversion using an electrical shock (DC-cardioversion) is an important treatment to reduce symptoms and improve patient's quality-of-life. The treatment is performed by applying gel electrodes to the chest. Cardioversion is not always successful, and it is unknown which electrode-position provides the optimal efficacy.
This study aims to compare two electrode positions, which are in clinical use: Anterior-posterior (left front and left back) versus anterior-lateral (right front and left side of the chest).
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Escalating energy shocks (100 J, 150 J, 200 J, 360 J) using anterior-posterior electrode position
Other names: LIFEPAK 20, Physio-Control/Stryker
Escalating energy shocks (100 J, 150 J, 200 J, 360 J) using anterior-lateral electrode position
Other names: LIFEPAK 20, Physio-Control/Stryker
Time frame: Immediately after first cardioversion attempt.
The primary endpoint will be first shock efficacy, i.e. the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm for at least one minute immediately after an initial shock of 100 J.
Time frame: One minute after cardioversion
The secondary efficacy endpoint will be cardioversion success, i.e. the proportion of patients in sinus rhythm for at least one minute after end of protocol.
Time frame: Within 2 hours after cardioversion (until discharge)
Secondary safety endpoints will be arrhythmia during and after cardioversion (asystole, transient bradycardia, ventricular arrhythmia, atrioventricular block, recurrence of atrial fibrillation)
Time frame: Two hours after cardioversion (at discharge)
Patient-reported peri-procedural discomfort when asked at discharge.
University of Aarhus
Other
Comparison of Anterior-Posterior Versus Anterior-Lateral Electrode Position in Cardioverting Atrial Fibrillation - A Randomized Clinical Trial
Acronym: EPIC
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05820295
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
New York, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05993897
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Aswān, Aswan Governorate, Egypt
View Trial DetailsNCT05357690
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05164718
Arrhythmias, Cardiac, Atrial Fibrillation
Drammen, Norway
View Trial Details