EMS
DeviceAbdominal muscle stimulation using EMS
NCT Number: NCT05256771
Multi-center, three-arm, randomized, evaluator-blinded study of electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) and/or 1064 nm diode laser, pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) and vacuum assisted radio frequency (RF) using the Venus Bliss Max for fat reduction, body contouring and aesthetic improvement.
This study is active but is not currently recruiting participants.
Notify Me18 year–65 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Scripps Clinical Research - General Medicine, San Diego, California, United States
The study will enroll up to 60 male and female subjects, ≥ 18 years of age, requesting non-invasive electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) and/or lipolysis of the abdomen and flanks. Subjects will be randomized to one of three arms as per randomization scheme.
This study will have 3 Arms at a ratio of 2:1:1 (A:B:C):
Arm A: Full Treatment Arm (Laser + EMS + RF/PEMF) Arm B: EMS/RF Arm (EMS + RF/PEMF) Arm C: EMS Arm (EMS only)
Arm A: Three (3) diode laser treatments treatments at days 0, 28 and 56 (±2 days). Subjects will also receive bi-weekly electrical muscle stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF)/vacuum assisted radio frequency (RF) treatments at days 0, 14, 28, 42 and 56 (±2 days).
Arm B: Subjects will receive bi-weekly electrical muscle stimulation and pulsed electromagnetic fields/vacuum assisted radio frequency treatments at days 0, 14, 28, 42 and 56 (±2 days).
Arm C: Subjects will receive weekly electrical muscle stimulation treatments at days 0, 7, 14, 21, 28 and 35 (±2 days).
Subjects in Arms A and B will be followed at 84 and 140 days (±7 days) after their last treatment. Subjects in Arm C will be followed at 63 and 119 days (±7 days) after their last treatment.
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Abdominal muscle stimulation using EMS
Adipose tissue heating using 1064 nm diode laser
Collagen re-modelling and reduction in subcutaneous fat using RF/PEMF
Time frame: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Physician board-certified dermatologist to evaluate contour improvement per the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), with scores in order of 'most improved' to 'worse': Most improved (score of 5); Much improved (score of 4); Improved (score of 3); No change (score of 2); Worse (score of 1).
Time frame: Follow-up 1: 84 days (Arm A & B); 63 days (Arm C). Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Primary Investigator to evaluate live contour improvement compared to pre-treatment photographs per the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS), with scores in order of 'most improved' to 'worse': Most improved (score of 5); Much improved (score of 4); Improved (score of 3); No change (score of 2); Worse (score of 1).
Time frame: Follow-up 1: 84 days (Arm A & B); 63 days (Arm C). Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Subject self evaluation of the BSQ post treatment compared to Baseline with a possible score of: 5 (Very Satisfied); 4 (Satisfied); 3 (Neither Satisfied or Dissatisfied); 2 (Dissatisfied); and 1 (Very Dissatisfied).
Time frame: Treatment 1 and 3; Day 0 and Day 28 (Arm A and B). Treatment 1 and 5; Day 0 and Day 28 (Arm C). Follow-up 1: 84 days (Arm A & B); 63 days (Arm C). Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Pre- and post-treatment circumference (centimeters) changes made at Treatments 1 & 3 (Arm A & B) and Treatments 1 & 5 (Arm C). Follow-up visit circumference (centimeters) made at 1 and 3 months post treatment compared to baseline (All Arms).
Time frame: Treatment 1; Day 0 (All Arms). Follow-up 1: 84 days (Arm A & B); 63 days (Arm C). Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Pre- and post-treatment abdominal skinfold thickness (millimeters) changes made at Treatment 1. Follow-up visit abdominal skinfold thickness (millimeters) changes made at one and three months post-treatment compared to baseline (All Arms).
Time frame: Treatment 1; Day 0 (All Arms). Follow-up 1: 84 days (Arm A & B); 63 days (Arm C). Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Pre- and post-treatment weight measurement (kg/lbs) changes made at Treatment 1. Follow-up visit weight measurement (kg/lbs) changes made at one and three months post-treatment compared to baseline (All Arms).
Time frame: Follow-up 1: 84 days (Arm A & B); 63 days (Arm C). Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Abdominal fat and muscle thickness (millimeters) changes from baseline to Follow-up 1 & 2 post last treatment as assessed using abdominal US images, compared to baseline.
Time frame: Follow-up 2: 140 days (Arms A & B); 119 days (Arm C)
Abdominal fat and muscle thickness (millimeters) changes from baseline to Follow-up 2 post last treatment as assessed using MRI, compared to baseline.
Venus Concept
Industry
Safety and Efficacy of Electrical Muscle Stimulation Combined with 1064 Nm Diode Laser, Pulsed Electromagnetic Field (PEMF) and Vacuum Assisted Radio Frequency (RF) for Non-invasive Body Contouring and Fat Reduction.
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT01101997
Fat Reduction
Sacramento, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03647748
Fat Reduction
Cape Coral, Florida, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03241563
Fat Reduction
San Diego, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT04426526
Muscle Hypertonia, Muscle Tone Increased
Fort Collins, Colorado, United States
View Trial Details