Electrical Impedance Myography as an Outcome Measure in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Clinical Trials

Trials evaluating new therapies for stopping or slowing the progression of ALS depend critically upon the use of outcome measures to assess whether a potential treatment is effective. The more effective an outcome measure, the fewer patients need to be enrolled and the shorter the trial. Many outcome measures have been used over the years, including strength assessments, breathing tests, functional status surveys, and nerve testing, but all are far from ideal. A new method, called electrical impedance myography (EIM) appears to be especially promising in that it provides very consistent data from one testing session to the next, is sensitive to the muscle deterioration that occurs in ALS, and is entirely painless and non-invasive. In this study, investigators from multiple institutions plan to compare several different outcome measures, including EIM, in approximately 120 ALS patients, with each patient being followed for a period of one year. All of these measures will be compared to one another and an assessment of their ability to detect disease progression made. Our goal will be to determine whether EIM can serve as a valuable new outcome measure, ultimately leading to substantially faster, more effective ALS trials requiring fewer patients.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Conditions

Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Central Nervous System Diseases Metabolic Diseases Motor Neuron Disease Nervous System Diseases Neurodegenerative Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases Proteostasis Deficiencies Spinal Cord Diseases TDP-43 Proteinopathies

Age range

18 year–85 year

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, United States

Who can participate

Healthy volunteers accepted: No

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

Definite or probably ALS by El Escorial criteria
Muscle strength of at 3.5 in one limb

Exclusion criteria

Forced vital capacity of less than 70%
Atypical forms of motor neuron disease (monomelic amyotrophy, primary lateral sclerosis)
Pacemaker

Treatment and study plan

Primary outcomes

Electrical Impedance Myography

Time frame: 6 months

The main outcome measure was the coefficient of variation (CoV) in the rate of the decline for each measure over time. The CoV was calculated by dividing the standard deviation in the rate of decline across the group of subjects and dividing that by the mean rate of decline for the cohort. This approach was taken for each of the measures being evaluated (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, Handheld dynamometry, Electrical impedance myography). The lower the CoV in the rate of decline, the more sensitive it is to identifying a potential treatment effect, since it suggests gives a measure of homogeneity of the rate of decline across the population as well as the overall rate of decline. The smaller the standard deviation across the group and the larger the mean rate of decline across the group, the lower the CoV and the fewer number of subjects needed for a potential clinical trial using that outcome measure.

Secondary outcomes

ALS Functional Rating Scale

Time frame: 6 months

The main outcome measure was the coefficient of variation (CoV) in the rate of the decline for each measure over time. The CoV was calculated by dividing the standard deviation in the rate of decline across the group of subjects and dividing that by the mean rate of decline for the cohort. This approach was taken for each of the measures being evaluated (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, Handheld dynamometry, Electrical impedance myography). The lower the CoV in the rate of decline, the more sensitive it is to identifying a potential treatment effect, since it suggests gives a measure of homogeneity of the rate of decline across the population as well as the overall rate of decline. The smaller the standard deviation across the group and the larger the mean rate of decline across the group, the lower the CoV and the fewer number of subjects needed for a potential clinical trial using that outcome measure.
Handheld Dynamometry

Time frame: 6 months

The main outcome measure was the coefficient of variation (CoV) in the rate of the decline for each measure over time. The CoV was calculated by dividing the standard deviation in the rate of decline across the group of subjects and dividing that by the mean rate of decline for the cohort. This approach was taken for each of the measures being evaluated (ALS Functional Rating Scale-Revised, Handheld dynamometry, Electrical impedance myography). The lower the CoV in the rate of decline, the more sensitive it is to identifying a potential treatment effect, since it suggests gives a measure of homogeneity of the rate of decline across the population as well as the overall rate of decline. The smaller the standard deviation across the group and the larger the mean rate of decline across the group, the lower the CoV and the fewer number of subjects needed for a potential clinical trial using that outcome measure.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center

Other

Collaborators

ALS Association

Registry information

Official study title

Electrical Impedance Myography as an Outcome Measure in ALS Clinical Trials

Important dates

Study start: 2007
Primary completion: 2011
Study completion: 2012
First posted: Feb 21, 2008
Registry last updated: Sep 25, 2014

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.

Completed