Harborview Medical Center
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
NCT Number: NCT05178121
Project WISE (Workplace Integrated Support & Education) includes developmental and pilot research to create an e-learning training in suicide safety planning enhanced with novel skill-building technologies that can be integrated into the routine workflow of nurses serving patients hospitalized for medical, surgical, or traumatic injury reasons. This study pilots an initial version of this eLearning training and collects data on the acceptability of the training and its components as well as engagement of nurses in the training. The evaluation will inform iterations of the training.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year and older
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Seattle, Washington, 98104, United States
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
-
The training includes a web-based didactic in suicide safety planning, interactive practice in counseling microskills with a chat bot, role-playing safety planning with a standardized patient, and reviewing automated feedback on safety planning counseling skills generated from a computer coding system.
Time frame: Once, immediately after engaging with each of the training technologies
The System Usability Scale, a self-report measure using a Likert-type rating scale, will assess acceptability of the two technologic training components: Client Bot Emily and Lyssn Advisor. Client Bot Emily is a virtual patient/chat bot with the persona of a suicidal patient. Nurses chat with Emily and practice skills of asking open-ended questions and making reflections about statements Emily makes. Lyssn Advisor is an online platform that automatically codes transcripts of audio or video recorded role-plays for counseling skills; nurses then log in to the platform to see their scores, which provides feedback on their counseling performance.
Scores on the SUS range from 0-100, which higher scores indicating greater usability or acceptability.
Time frame: Immediately after completing the training
A 4-item self-report measure created for this study will assess satisfaction with all of the training components using a Likert-type scale of 0 = Not at all satisfied to 4 = Completely satisfied.
Time frame: 6-months after completing the training
A 4-item self-report measure created for this study will assess satisfaction with all of the training components using a Likert-type scale of 0 = Not at all satisfied to 4 = Completely satisfied.
Time frame: Immediately after participants indicate they have completing the training activities
Data is collected from the technologic platform on whether and how often participants accessed the training technologies. Engagement is indicated by participants accessing the platform using their unique login and interacting with the webpage associated with the Client Bot. The unit of measurement will be the number of participants who accessed the Client Bot during the training period.
Time frame: Immediately after participants indicate they have completing the training activities
Data is collected from the technologic platform on whether and how often participants accessed the training technologies. Engagement is indicated by participants accessing the platform using their unique login and interacting with the webpage associated with the Lyssn Advisor. The unit of measurement will be the frequency of times participants visits the Lyssn Advisor webpage.
Time frame: 6-months after participants indicate they have completed the training activities
Data is collected from the technologic platform on whether and how often participants accessed the training technologies. Engagement is indicated by participants accessing the platform using their unique login and interacting with the webpage associated with the Client Bot. The unit of measurement will be the number of participants who logged on and interacted with the Client Bot after the training period and before completing the 6-month survey.
Time frame: 6-months after participants indicate they have completed the training activities
Data is collected from the technologic platform on whether and how often participants accessed the training technologies. Engagement is indicated by participants accessing the platform using their unique login and interacting with the webpage associated with the Lyssn Advisor. The unit of measurement will be the frequency of times participants visits the Lyssn Advisor webpage during the 6-month follow-up period.
Time frame: Immediately after participants indicate they have completed the training activities
Investigators will collect self-reported completion of the training activities using a 4-item measure. Participants will report on a sliding scale from 0-100, what percent of each training activity they believe they completed.
Time frame: 6-months after participants indicate they have completed the training activities
Participants will self-report whether or not they accessed any of the training technologies during the follow-up period.
Time frame: 6 Months after completing the training
Percent of participants retained throughout study follow-up
Time frame: Once, immediately after engaging with each of the training technologies
The System Usability Scale, a self-report measure using a Likert-type rating scale, will assess acceptability of the two technologic training components: Client Bot Emily and Lyssn Advisor. Client Bot Emily is a virtual patient/chat bot with the persona of a suicidal patient. Nurses chat with Emily and practice skills of asking open-ended questions and making reflections about statements Emily makes. Lyssn Advisor is an online platform that automatically codes transcripts of audio or video recorded role-plays for counseling skills; nurses then log in to the platform to see their scores, which provides feedback on their counseling performance.
Scores on the SUS range from 0-100, which higher scores indicating greater usability or acceptability.
Time frame: 6-months after participants indicate they have completed the training activities
Participants will self-report whether or not they accessed any of the training technologies during the follow-up period.
University of Washington
Other
Formative Evaluation of an eLearning Approach to Suicide Prevention Training
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT05272176
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05657119
Accidental Injuries, Behavior
Kotzebue, Alaska, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05275101
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Columbus, Ohio, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05345184
Behavior, Behavioral Symptoms
Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States
View Trial Details