Elagolix
DrugProvided as tablets for oral administration
Other names: NBI-56418, Orilissa™
NCT Number: NCT00437658
This study is designed to assess the effects of elagolix versus subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC; also known as depo-provera) on bone mineral density (BMD) during treatment for 24 weeks with a subsequent 24-week post-treatment period.
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–49 year
Female
Interventional
Phase 2
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
Provided as tablets for oral administration
Other names: NBI-56418, Orilissa™
Provided for subcutaneous injection in a prefilled syringe, 104 mg/0.65 mL per syringe.
Other names: depo-subQ provera 104™
Matching placebo tablets for oral administration
Matching placebo for subcutaneous injection in a pre-filled syringe
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in spine and femur BMD at week 24 was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model. The absence of significant bone loss was supported if the lower bounds of the confidence intervals for the mean percent change in BMD were ≥ -2.2% for both the spine and femur at week 24.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12 and 48
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12 and 48
Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). The percent change from baseline in BMD was assessed using a one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) model.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 12, 24 and 48
Blood samples to determine N-telopeptide concentrations were analyzed by a central laboratory using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Change from baseline in N-telopeptide was analyzed using a one-way ANOVA model.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation), dyspareunia (painful intercourse), non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration (hardening). Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question "Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?".
Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and week 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question "Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?" Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question "Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?".
Participants were classified as responders for dysmenorrhea if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 24, 28, 36, and 48
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question "Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?" Participants were classified as responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain if they reported a 1 point or greater reduction (improvement) from baseline.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination.
The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning).
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and nonmenstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment, pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination.
The total CPSSS excluding dyspareunia has a maximum possible value of 12 (total score range: 0 to 12, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning).
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
The dysmenorrhea score was based on the participant's response to the question "Have you had painful menstruation during the last 28 days?".
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
The dyspareunia score was based on the participant's response to the question "Have you had painful intercourse during the last 28 days?" Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
The non-menstrual pelvic pain score was based on participant's response to the question "Have you had pelvic pain during the last 28 days?".
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
Pelvic tenderness was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination.
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe).
Pelvic induration was assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination.
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled "no pain" and the right extreme was labeled "worst pain ever felt" scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly peak VAS for pelvic pain was defined as the maximum VAS pain score reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit.
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The VAS for pelvic pain was used as an assessment of pain intensity. The VAS was a horizontal line on which the left extreme was labeled "no pain" and the right extreme was labeled "worst pain ever felt" scored on a scale from of 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst pain ever felt). Participants indicated the worst level of pain felt over a 24-hour period by ''ticking'' the horizontal line on their e-Diary at approximately the same time each day. Monthly mean VAS for pelvic pain defined as the average of all VAS pain scores reported for an individual participant from the previous visit to the day of the current scheduled visit.
Change from baseline was analyzed using a mixed-effects repeated measures (MERM) analysis of covariance model which included fixed effects for treatment, time, treatment-by-time interaction, a random effect for patient, and terms for baseline value and the baseline-by-time interaction.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24
The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts:
Each question was scored on a five point scale (Never = 0, Rarely = 25, Sometimes = 50, Often = 75, Always = 100), or Not Relevant (no score), where 0 indicates the best health status and 100 worst health status. A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Time frame: 24 weeks
Analgesic use was collected as part of concomitant medications on a case report form that was administered at each scheduled visit.
AbbVie
Industry
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-blind, Active-controlled Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of NBI-56418 in Subjects With Endometriosis
Acronym: PETAL
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07241637
Endometriosis, Fatigue
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
View Trial DetailsNCT05962034
Endometriosis, Female Urogenital Diseases
University Park, Pennsylvania, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05019612
Endometriosis, Expectations
Hamburg, Germany
View Trial DetailsNCT00073801
Chronic Pelvic Pain, Endometriosis
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
View Trial Details