University of Wisconsin Center for Tobacco Research and Intervention, School of Medicine and Public Health
Madison, Wisconsin, 57311-2027, United States
NCT Number: NCT02735382
This study is designed to assess whether completely electronic, HIPAA-compliant, EHR-based, closed-loop referrals for tobacco cessation from primary care clinics to a state telephone tobacco quitline service can increase the number/percentage of adult tobacco users receiving evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment when compared to paper-based fax referrals. This study also will survey clinic staff to evaluate satisfaction with the referral process.
Looking for future studies?
Notify MeAll sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Madison, Wisconsin, 57311-2027, United States
Aim 1: To evaluate the rates of referral of tobacco users visiting primary care clinics to the WTQL, comparing those who were referred via an EHR-based electronic referral system vs. those referred via a manual paper fax referral system. Analyses will address the change in rates of referrals from pre- to post-intervention and the trajectory of referral post-intervention and will reflect per clinic rates.
Aim 2: To evaluate the rates of quality referrals of tobacco users visiting primary care clinics to the WTQL, comparing those who were referred via an EHR-based electronic referral system vs. those referred via a manual paper fax referral system (quality referrals are defined as ones that result in individuals who enroll in and receive WTQL counseling and/or medication treatment services). Analyses will address the change in referrals from pre- to post-intervention and will reflect per clinic rates.
Aim 3: To examine variation in referral rates across clinics to test the hypothesis that the eReferral system will result in greater consistency in referral in addition to higher rates of referral. Qualitative methods will be used to understand the sources of variation.
Aim 4: To assess clinician and staff satisfaction with the eReferral and paper fax referral systems via self-report questionnaires.
Aim 5: To evaluate smoking abstinence rates of tobacco users who were referred to and accepted services from the WTQL, comparing those who were referred via an EHR-based referral system vs. those referred via a manual paper fax referral system.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Clinic Eligibility:
Inclusion criteria
Exclusion criteria
(Note: In this study, the clinics are the "subjects" under study. The patients that will be referred by the clinic to the Wisconsin Tobacco Quit Line will be least 18 years old and Cigarette smokers)
Using an EHR-based referral to the tobacco quitline from primary care outpatient clinics.
Using an Fax--based referral to the tobacco quitline from primary care outpatient clinics.
Time frame: Rates come from cumulative data collected over the course of 6 months.
EHR-based vs. Fax-based rates of referral of adult tobacco users visiting primary care clinics to the tobacco quitline. The rate of referral will be determined by the ratio of total referrals to total smokers identified in the clinic's EHR over a period of 6 months of study observation.
Time frame: Rates come from cumulative data collected over the course of 6 months.
To evaluate the rates of quality referrals of tobacco users visiting primary care clinics to the tobacco quitline. Quality referrals are defined as ones that result in individuals who enroll in and receive tobacco quit line services.
Time frame: 7-day point prevalence smoking outcomes at 4-months after participant registration with the WI Tobacco Quit Line.
To evaluate smoking abstinence rates of tobacco users who were referred to and accepted services from the WTQL, comparing those who were referred via an EHR-based referral system vs. those referred via a manual paper fax referral system.
Time frame: Satisfaction measures will be surveyed at baseline and at 6 months and reported as a single change score
In order to assess clinician and staff satisfaction with the eReferral and paper-based referral systems, a single-item "The steps I need to take to address my patients' tobacco use are efficient and well designed" was administered to healthcare system clinical staff. The response format was 1 = Strongly disagree; 2 = Disagree; 3 = Mildly disagree; 4 = Feel neutral; 5 = Mildly agree; 6 = Agree; 7 = Strongly agree. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the assigned intervention (EHR-based vs Fax-based referral systems). The item is not part of any existing validated scale and was created for purposes of the project; this item was selected from a larger set of items and determined to be the most appropriate measure of overall staff satisfaction.
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Other
Transforming the Treatment of Tobacco Use in Health Care: Seizing the Potential of the Electronic Health Record to Deliver Comprehensive Chronic Care Treatment for Smoking: Study 1: the EHR and Fax Referral Study
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT03259360
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03194958
Behavior, Behavior, Addictive
St Louis, Missouri, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03645941
Behavior, Cigarette Smoking
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT03553992
Behavior, Chemically-Induced Disorders
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial Details