SMR Val Rosay
Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or, France, 69370
NCT Number: NCT06421753
To determine whether Spatially Distributed Sequential Functional Electrical Stimulation is more effective than Standard Electrical Stimulation During Functional Electrical Stimulation in Upper Motor Neuron Patients
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me18 year–80 year
All sexes
Interventional
Not applicable
Saint-Didier-au-Mont-d'Or, France, 69370
Design: SCED (single case experimental design) prospective, monocentric, comparative interventional study (SDSS versus SES) Population: patients with motor deficit due to upper motor neuron syndrome Setting: Neurologic Rehabilitation Unit Interventions: 3 FES cycling sessions separated by 48h of rest. Each session is comprised of 2 phases separated by 20 minutes of rest. Each phase is comprised of a 3 minutes passive cycling warm-up, followed by 3 minutes of electrically stimulated cycling.
Participants will be evaluated before and during the training.
Healthy volunteers accepted: No
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Patients with Upper Motor Neuron syndrome:
Exclusion criteria
Each session begins with a 3-minute warm-up phase, followed by a 3-minute stimulation phase. The motor rotates the legs at 50 rpm during both phases. The type of stimulation used in the first phase is chosen randomly. After a 20-minute break, the second warm-up and stimulation phases are carried out During the second session, the order of the stimulation phases is reversed.
Each session begins with a 3-minute warm-up phase, followed by a 3-minute stimulation phase. The motor rotates the legs at 50 rpm during both phases. The type of stimulation used in the first phase is chosen randomly. After a 20-minute break, the second warm-up and stimulation phases are carried out During the second session, the order of the stimulation phases is reversed.
Time frame: during sessions of FES cycling
The subjects are installed on a Hepha Bike electrostimulation bike, equipped with force-torque measuring pedals (ICS_RM, Sensix, France), synchronized with a MotiMove-8 stimulator. The average quadriceps power (watts) during the first and last 30 seconds of each stimulation phase, as well as the total average power (Pm) are calculated.
Time frame: before the first session of FES cycling
Dry electrode then hydrogel electrode are placed on the quadriceps' motor point The amplitude of stimulation is increased in steps of 3 mA followed by 5 seconds of rest for subsequent trains until the subject feels a burning sensation. the stimulation threshold (mA) is compared between dry and hydrogel electrode
UGECAM Rhône-Alpes
Other
Acronym: SDSS_UMS
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07284810
Motor Neuron Disease, Nervous System Diseases
San Francisco, California, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT05183152
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Austin, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06117020
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
San Antonio, Texas, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT06608121
Autoimmune Diseases, Autoimmune Diseases of the Nervous System
Rennes, France
View Trial Details