Cairo University
Cairo, Egypt
NCT Number: NCT06554769
Indirect anchorage (In-A) has been broadly used for anchorage reinforcement during anterior segment retraction. The study compared between the efficacy of rigid vs non-rigid connections of In-A i during upper canine retraction in dentoalveolar protrusion cases
Looking for future studies?
Notify Me13 year–23 year
Female
Interventional
Not applicable
Cairo, Egypt
Fifteen female patients with dentoalveolar protrusion were included in this study. A miniscrew was inserted following levelling and alignment between the upper first molar and second premolar of both sides. Randomization was applied before first premolar extraction where one side of the arch received a rigid indirect anchorage connection (Group I) of 0.019 x 0.025-inch stainless steel (St.St) archwire from the miniscrew to the auxiliary tube of the upper first molar band, and the other side received a non-rigid indirect anchorage connection (Group II) of 0.014-inch St.St ligature ligating the upper second premolar to the miniscrew. Canine retraction was performed on 0.017 x 0.025-inch St.St archwire applying 1.5 N retraction force. The duration of the study was 7 months. Data was collected from digitized models where anchorage loss of the upper first molar relative to the frontal plane and the vertical position of the upper second premolar were measured
Healthy volunteers accepted: Yes
Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.
Inclusion criteria
Adult females Bimaxillary protrusion requiring first premolars extractions Full permanent dentition Good oral hygiene
Exclusion criteria
History of previous orthodontic treatment Abnormalities in teeth size and/or shape Vertical, transverse, or anteroposterior skeletal discrepancies Anti-inflammatory medication
a nonrigid connection is placed between the miniscrews and the second premolar to prevent mesial tooth movement.
a rigid connection is placed between the miniscrews and the first molar to prevent mesial tooth movement.
Time frame: 4 month
amount of anchorage loss of the upper first molar during canine retraction using digital model in mm.
Time frame: 4 month
The secondary outcome was to assess the change in the vertical position of the upper second premolar following canine retraction using indirect anchorage using digital models in mm.
Cairo University
Other
OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.
View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.
Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.
NCT07698730
Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Can Tho, Vietnam
View Trial DetailsNCT06814262
Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Richmond, Virginia, United States
View Trial DetailsNCT07546058
Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Latakia, Latakia Governorate, Syria
View Trial DetailsNCT06416904
Orthodontic Appliance Complication
Cairo, Egypt
View Trial Details