Skip to main content
OpenTrials
Completed

NCT Number: NCT04341714

Efficiency and Satisfaction With Telephone Consultation in Neuro-urology: Experience of the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has necessitated drastic measures in order to limit the spread of SARS-CoV-2. The stay home policies for the whole population and especially for frail patients and the express instruction to deprogram non-urgent consultations and interventions limited the clinic visits in neuro-urology department. In this context, telemedicine was seen as a pragmatic solution to provide follow-up care for our neurologic patients. Due to the delay in deploying telemedicine and the cognitive impairment of some of our patients, telephone consultation has been prioritized.

The COVID-19 pandemic might be an opportunity to review and refine our practices in neuro-urology. For the follow-up of selected patients, telephone consultations may be efficient and cost effective.

The aim of the study is to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction with telephone consultation for the physician and the patient.

The study was conducted in a neuro-urology department of a university hospital in France.

During the stay-home policies for the COVID-19 pandemic, all the scheduled medical visits were converted into telephone consultation. New patients weren't included.

For each teleconsultation, the physician assess the duration of the consultation, the number of tries to join the patient, the efficiency of the consultation, the difficulty to obtain relevant information due to the phone way of the consultation and the lack of physical examination.

On the next days, the patient was contacted by phone and was asked a) if he was satisfied of being phoned by the physician, b) if the teleconsultation was embarrassing, c) if he had enough time of teleconsultation d) if he got all the answers to his queries, e) if he would preferred to had a physical consultation f) to assessed the global satisfaction of the teleconsultation and g) if in the future, they may considered converting some clinic visits to teleconsultations.

The physician and the patient assessed whether this teleconsultation has replaced a physical visit.

The usual transport mode of the patient for a clinic visit and the need to take a day off for worker patients were recorded.

The primary aim was to assess the efficiency and the satisfaction of the telephone consultation. The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on a numerical 10-points scale. The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the satisfaction of the telephone consultation by the patient on a numerical 10-points scale.

Four hundred teleconsultations are scheduled for five physicians.

Completed

Looking for future studies?

Notify Me

Key information

Age range

18 year and older

Sex eligibility

All sexes

Study type

Observational

Primary location

Department of Neuro- Urology, Hôpital Tenon

Paris, 75020, France

Who can participate

Only the study team can determine whether someone qualifies for participation.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years old
  • Telephone consultation

Exclusion criteria

  • New patient in the department

Treatment and study plan

Satisfaction evaluation

Other

Assessement of satisfaction of the telephone consultation

Primary outcomes

  1. Efficiency of the telephone consultation

    Time frame: 1 day

    The primary outcome was the evaluation of the efficiency of the telephone consultation by the physician on the numeric scale with 0 the worth efficiency and 10 the best efficiency.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Satisfaction of the telephone consultation

    Time frame: 1 day

    The secondary outcome was the evaluation of the satisfaction of the telephone consultation by the patient onon the numeric scale with 0 the worth efficiency and 10 the best efficiency.

Sponsors and collaborators

Lead sponsor

Pierre and Marie Curie University

Other

Registry information

Important dates

Study start
2020
Primary completion
2020
Study completion
2020
First posted
Apr 10, 2020
Registry last updated
Jun 15, 2021

OpenTrials presents study information sourced from ClinicalTrials.gov. The official registry record should be consulted for the latest information.

View the official ClinicalTrials.gov record (opens in a new tab)

This listing is for discovery and informational purposes only. It is not medical advice, does not guarantee that a study is recruiting, and does not determine eligibility. Contact the study team and a qualified healthcare professional when considering participation.

Published trials that share one or more normalized conditions with this study.